User:Ohiostandard/sandbox

__NOINDEX__

Luke 19 Verse 27

 * Can we ban someone for putting his "lulz" above the goal of contributing to the encyclopaedia?
 * Or for putting a desire to slur a minority he dislikes above that goal?

(1) 'Luke' gives us the photo/caption on the left, at Palestinian people, saying " useful cultural context ".

(2) Next he adds photo/caption at right to the "Palestinian handicrafts" section of same article.


 * Implication appears to be that Palestinians are street thugs who jack tires for fun and profit as a "handicraft"?

(3) Admin Zero reverts girls' photo, saying "Undid revision 493116625 by Luke 19 Verse 27 grossly offensive caption ".

(4) 'Luke' reinstates, saying, in part, It was offensive and culturally bias of me to imply these were girls ."


 * This smart-alek edit summary confirms that Luke wants readers to believe that Palestinians consider little girls to be adult women for the purpose of marriage and sexuality.

(5) He responds to criticism from admin Zero on his talk by incorrectly claiming that only adult women wear a headscarf/hijab, and Luke then continues with this bizarre, flip reply:


 * The shine in this story is a metaphor for love. I am the Sun and you are the Earth. My love makes you warm, doesn't it? If you don't like the caption, my blue-green loveball, then change it. But try to keep the project going with construction, not destruction, and certainly the Earth is great and vast and noble, but it doesn't tell the Sun what to do. Don't throw around geocentric orders.

(6) Admin Malik Shabazz removes both photos.

The first photo and caption were certainly intended by this advocate for Israel to convey the implication that Palestinians confuse little girls and adult women for the purpose of sexuality and marriage: See collapsed section above. And the addition of what Luke called "Tire crafts" to the "Palestinian handicrafts" section of the article was either vandalistic buffoonery, or an attempt to suggest that Palestinians strip cars as a hobby, or both.

It was just days ago, at 10:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC), that Kim Dent-Brown blocked Luke after seeing and assuming diminished capacity or a compromised account. Kim explains the problem to Luke here, and in this subsequent section, where she asks him to "stick to the task" and he replies by saying it was good advice, but adds "Hopefully in the future you will enjoy more of my contributions and wit."

When these most recent distractions from the purpose of the project are taken into consideration with previous junk on his talk, like this,


 * I find myself drawn to fat girls, with big breasts. I think it has to do with gravity, but I'm no physicist. I once wanted to bang a physicist, but I only got one D out of the deal. I feel really happy for your Zionist conquest. Hopefully you put your goy seed in her Greater Israel (between the two legs). Then, when he grows up in a free country, after suckin' Mamma Tel Aviverrific Shag's milk-n-honies, he can teach me what "Mazaltov" means... But about the bitches. I don't know much about Polish girls. Are they fat?

... well, then I don't see that this person is an asset here. What does everyone else think? Does this person's presence support the goal of producing an encyclopaedia, or interfere with it for his own amusement? --OhioStandard (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * PS: Neither Zero or Malik Shabazz could block Luke for this, btw, since they're both involved editors in the topic area. --Ohiostandard