User:Oikogeniakes15/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?

 * Talk:Gymnosophists

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose his article because I like Greek philosophy and uses Greek words. I need work. It misses citations and uses words like "some", and "many authors" without specifying who. Also, one of the articles was " not a secure connection"

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

It does give an introductory story that is not as concise and is not clear because they do not specify people and misses citations.

The lead description is relative to the rest of the story.

Yes. it does have info that doesn't exist in the article because when I clicked on the article it said that there was not a secure connection therefore the article was not available.

The lead is overly detailed. I do not think it is concise because it has much information without proper citation which confuses the reader.

Content:

No is not relative. The lean section talks about the definition of the Gymnosophists and gives information that is not relative to the content that mostly talks about the Great Alexander.

The content is from 2006 to 2016 information.

Not all citations work and some have no citation. The content has peer-reviewed articles and books.

The tone of the content is information-based and has no favoritism.

Not as concise and organized. It does not follow a clear path for the reader to understand. It just adds pieces of info that are not as connected to make a clear understanding.

Grammar is good except for some comma errors and a word correction instead of "was" they used "were."

Has two images and both are cited and are relevant to the content.

The talk page says that there are errors and that some info is not connected. Also, it is in the Wikiprojects. Some of them(religion C-class, philosophy-Ancient C class low importance ect )

The article is mostly for educational purposes and the strength is that gives details on explaining the story behind the meaning of the words, however, it needs work on the organization of the content, and the structure could be clearer to help the reader connect with the context also needs more citations. I would say that the article is underdeveloped.