User:Okinawalover/Horace Ward/Okinawalover Peer Review

Peer Review
 Horace Ward 

Lead


 * The lead has been updated to reflect the content added by peer.
 * The lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly states the topic of the article.
 * But see this edit.
 * The lead includes a brief description of the topics that will be discussed in the article.
 * The lead does not include information that is not present in the article.

Content


 * The content added is relevant to the current topic and is up to date.
 * That's probably easy since he's dead.
 * There is a lot of content missing.
 * Horace Ward had many accomplishments and constantly faced adversity growing up and none of his set backs or wins are mentioned.
 * The article is just too bare-bones for that, and that's kind of a shame. But what's missing? Do you know? And where can we find that?

Tone and Balance


 * The content of the article is neutral.
 * None of the content in the article is persuasive.

Sources and References


 * There are very little sources listed that lead to beneficial content of the article.
 * There are a total of five references and sources combined and two of them are related to his death.
 * One is Find A Grave.com, which is user-submitted and thus not reliable. You can make more detailed statements about the other sources.

Overall Impression


 * This article is missing a lot of crucial information.
 * Horace Ward accomplished a lot and his wins ad losses are not mentioned.
 * The framework is nice, but there is a lot that needs to be accomplished.