User:Okrowe/Daniel Katz (psychologist)/JohnsWiki2023 Peer Review

Hello Okrowe,

Below is what I posted in the Discussion on Blackboard last week. I think some of it is obsolete now, since you have added more to your Sandbox. Which looks great by the way! Looks like you have made more edits since then. I think the little link button may come in handy still though (explained below). Other than that, everything looks to be coming along nicely.

In the biography you have a few notes on what your next edit is going to be. Which is good, because taking notes before you type helps with Plagiarism.

Work Section looks good too. Don't forget about the links to your citations though at the end of a paragraph and/or sentence. I am still having to figure out how to tie my links back into what is on the fully Published Article, so you could be doing the same.

Other than that, everything looks good. I don't know if this is supposed to be an ongoing Review, so if there is anything else you need some help with or would like for me to review again, just let me know.

Discussion Board:

Bibliography – Looks like a lot of good sources. I think we was supposed to do a small description on how we planned on using the sources we found. Which helped me out a little to kind of remind myself why I chose the sources I did.

Sandbox – Looks like Okrowe has started on their Sandbox a little. What is there Involves Katz’s Personal life and what he accomplished during his visit to Norway. So far so good in my opinion. I think that once Okrowe finds the correct information it will be just plugging it in and then the edits will be complete. They are small edits, which is what Wikipedia I wanting. I think if there was more to be done, maybe adding an “Infobox” would be something quick and easy that would help out the article. This can include Katz’s picture, where he was born, spouse, education, etc. Another thing to remember is to add Links. It’s supper easy, if you click the little icon on the ribbon that looks like a link in a chain (or [ctrl]+[k]) if will pull up other Wikipedia links to certain words used in your edit. For example, you could maybe use a link for “Norway” or “visiting professor”.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)