User:Old Crooked leg/Cyclopes/CabbageP Peer Review

General info
Old Crooked leg
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Old Crooked leg/Cyclopes
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cyclopes

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead Section


 * Expanding on the final sentence of the lead is a good idea and would be benfitial to your article
 * Could use more citations throughout the lead.

Content


 * I think adding to the "Nonnus" section is a great idea, especialy if you have more sources!
 * Could add to "Callimachus" secton
 * The "Principle Sources" section could use some help, there's a lot of block quotes which I'm pretty sure is a wikipedia no-no. Could take those blocks and write them in your own words for the sections.

Tone and Balance


 * I think you've got a good sense of how to balance the content and so far your tone remains neutral.

Sources and References


 * Citation help - In order to create the hyperlinks within your text press the quotation mark button on the tool bar at the top of the page. From there wiki can make and add the citation for you, you'll just need to either provide a link or manually input the info. Happy citing!
 * Also if you want to include the hyperlinks from the original article - enter 'edit' mode on the original article before copying text, that way the citations should transfer.
 * This is a pretty well cited article but you can always use more sources.
 * Don't forget to link words to other wikipedia articles.

Organization


 * I think it moving the etymology section to directly after the lead makes it seem like its the most important information about Cyclopes. It might flow better at the bottom of the article with the "Possible Origins" section and instead you could add a brief sentence summarizing the etymology within the lead (after the pronunciation).
 * I think the "Possible Origins" section could be a good section if citations were found for the information (and possibly rewritten). It adds a unique bit of information to the article by dicussing possible real life 'inspirations' for the creation of cyclopes. The section would also benefit from a rename, "Possible Origins" feels misleading, kinda.

Images and Media


 * Could add another photo to the "Hesiodic Cyclopes" subsection - its a long block of text, needs something to break it up.
 * For Euripidese photo caption - use the photo description provided on wikimedia to create the caption

Overall

I think you've got a solid plan on where to take this article by rearranging one of the more important sections and planning to add to some sparce sections but there's some places that need some more work like the "Principle Sources" and "Possible Origins" sections. Overall you could use more citations and media, and your reorganization of the article can improve its quality and flow. Good work so far :)