User:Olivesaregreen/Nanomia bijuga/Lopezvilan Peer Review

General info
Nanomia bijuga
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Nanomia bijuga
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nanomia bijuga

Lead

 * Lead content is relevant and concise, and includes information found further.
 * Lead could be a good spot for opening more on the information provided further in the article.

Content

 * Content is relevant and split up well.
 * Maybe more can be said about the habitat?

Tone and Balance

 * The tone is professional and effective.

Sources and References

 * Sources are recent and from a variety of authors but are from sources that aren't published by scientific journals or notable websites.

Organization

 * Maybe you could consider combining the habitat section with the behavior section.
 * The bibliographic section could also use some editing in format to make it more professional.