User:Olivia2701/Intrapersonal communication/EyobKeflinkiel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

oliva2701


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Olivia2701/Intrapersonal_communication?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

lead:

I would say this part of the Wikipedia article is okay, it gives us a definition of what interpersonal communication is but it felt short. I think more information could of been added.

- no the lead does not include a brief description of the rest of the content.

-the lead was concise but lacked information.

Content:

- yes the content is relevant to the topic

- it does seem to be up to date

Tone and balance:

- yes the content is neutral

- no claims that are heavily biased

- the tone is informative, the article is trying to teach you

- no the content does not try to persuade you

Sources and References

the citation could need updating when I went through the article some of the citation were no updated, the would say "[citation needed]". If they were to be updated to have there real citations it would make the article  better. there were also content that should have some kind of citation but did not. With all of this I think the citation part of this article still needs work.

organization

This article is well organized each section of content has its own topic and they don't get mixed with each other.

Images and Media

There were no images in the article when I read through it, this could be a good way to enhance the article.

Overall impressions

I thought the article was good but could use some work to polish it. The content added did improve the overall quality the article. the way it can be improved is by working on the citation and maybe adding some images