User:Oliviaheaney/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Sean Bush

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because medicine interests me and I am curious as to the different types of physicians that practice emergency medicine.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

There is a lead that summarizes the main topic within the article. The lead does include a description of the articles major sections.

Content:

I feel as though there is a lot of content missing from this article and do not think it is detailed enough.

Tone:

The tone is neutral but is also feels as though the information is coming straight from the person writing it.

Sources/references:

I feel as though the article may not be up tp date and is lacking a lot of key information

Organization/ writing quality :

The writing quality was very basic and not scientific which I thought it was supposed to be. The article is not organized and kind of all over the place

Images/media:

There are no images within the article

Talk page discussion:

There are no discussions

Overall:

Overall, i feel as though this article is lacking. I was hoping to find a lot of medical and physician knowledge however it was very brief and never described anything the physician actually did.