User:Oliviaolcott/Christine Sun Kim

advice from Tim's peer review:


 * I think overall, the current version of the article has a great amount of sources. It doesn't seem to have any obvious unsourced claims.
 * Your biggest job would probably be expanding the existing sections since they're pretty sparse.
 * You could also look into adding a section on the public's reception to her work. There's some great lists of her exhibitions, but not much info about how it was received by people. That's something that many artists' articles have.
 * There is a bit of vagueness in the section headings. Why is one section called Art and the next called Artworks? You could provide a lot of clarity by updating, combining, or distinguishing those sections in some way.