User:Oliviaolcott/Christine Sun Kim/TJScalzo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * User:Oliviaolcott


 * Link to the current version of the article
 * Christine Sun Kim

Evaluate the current article

 * I think overall, the current version of the article has a great amount of sources. It doesn't seem to have any obvious unsourced claims.
 * Your biggest job would probably be expanding the existing sections since they're pretty sparse.
 * You could also look into adding a section on the public's reception to her work. There's some great lists of her exhibitions, but not much info about how it was received by people. That's something that many artists' articles have.
 * There is a bit of vagueness in the section headings. Why is one section called Art and the next called Artworks? You could provide a lot of clarity by updating, combining, or distinguishing those sections in some way.

Let me know if you have any questions about my feedback!