User:Oliviapants/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rape pornography - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The effects of pornography on the human psyche and the general public opinion on the subject are things that are really important to me. I have very strong and passionate opinions about these topics, and it is something I could research and fight against for the rest of my life.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:


 * the article does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
 * the article does include a brief description of the article's major sections
 * the article lead does not include any information that is not present in the article, but some things it mentioned definitely should have been expanded upon more
 * the lead is detailed and concise

Content:


 * the content is both up to date and relevant
 * there is no missing or non-belonging information, but I wish some topics were expanded upon more
 * the article deals with equity gaps slightly. it mentions cybersex and trafficking victims, which have been historically underrepresented groups of people. but, to me, they do not devote enough time to the topic

Tone and Balance


 * The article is neutral. So neutral, in fact, that it enrages me how unopinionated it is.
 * there are no claims that are biased
 * there are no over or underrepresented viewpoints
 * there are no minority or fringe viewpoints mentioned
 * the article does not attempt to persuade the reader

Sources and References


 * the facts are all backed up by reliable sources
 * the sources are thorough
 * the sources are current
 * the sources have diverse authors
 * I wouldn't say there are better sources, just that there are more sources than what they mentioned, and just because they didn't mention those sources does not mean the sources are bad
 * the links work

Organization and Writing Quality


 * the article is clear, concise, and easy to read
 * there are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * the article is well organized

Images and Media


 * there are no images in the article

Talk Page Discussions


 * they are talking about how the article is unclear in certain aspects. They are confused about whether just depictions of actual rape are illegal, or if staged rape is illegal as well. People believe the introduction needs to be expanded upon.
 * the article is rated as start-class and mid-importance. It is part of wikiprojects pornography section

Overall Impressions


 * I'm not sure what the article's status is, but I personally believe it is not completed and needs to be expanded upon, badly.
 * The article is very neutral if that counts as a strength
 * the article could be improved by expanding upon certain sub-topics of the category
 * the article is underdeveloped, for sure