User:Oliviariedy/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Bolivian chinchilla rat:
 * Article Evaluation Lead Section:
 * Only contains three sentences, detailing taxonomy, and its location and habitat Content:
 * Lacks any detailed content, has a section for both habitat and ecology and threats to the species, with no more than a short paragraph in each Tone and Balance:
 * Article shows no bias towards a certain viewpoint, just generally lacks information Sources and References:
 * Only 2 references are present for the data given in the article, the IUCN red list and a book from 2005. Organization and writing quality:
 * Current article offers concise, factual evidence on the sections present Images and Media:
 * There are no images or media present in this article Talk Page:
 * There are no discussions that have occurred in the talk page of the article Overall Impressions:
 * This article is a stub, and is missing key information that is available from various sources, and is quite sparse in what it does include within the habitat and ecology section as well as the threats section
 * This article could benefit from more sources, as well as more information, such as conservation efforts, habits of the animal and media
 * Sources
 * https://armoniabolivia.org/an-insight-into-the-often-underappreciated-yet-important-native-rodents-of-bolivia/ https://small-mammals.org/portfolio/bolivian-chinchilla-rat/
 * https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/18/22182349
 * https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Abrocoma_boliviensis/
 * https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/18/22182349
 * https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Abrocoma_boliviensis/

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Northern bettong
 * Article Evaluation Lead Section:
 * contains relevant information about the species  Content:
 * Lacks detailed content, has a section for habitat, lifespan, behavior, and threats. Only behavior has a decent amount of information  Tone and Balance:
 * Article shows no bias towards a certain viewpoint, just generally lacks information. Sources and References:
 * Good list of references, 7 in all, and more able to be found.  Organization and writing quality:
 * Current article offers concise, factual evidence on the sections present Images and Media:
 * There is a map of the species distribution, as well as a photograph of the species.  Talk Page:
 * There are no discussions that have occurred in the talk page of the article. Overall Impressions:
 * This article is a stub, and is missing key information that is available from various sources, and is quite sparse in what it does include, apart from the behavior section
 * This article could benefit from more sources, as well as more information, such as conservation efforts.
 * Sources:https://www.australianwildlife.org/wildlife/northern-bettong/ :https://wwf.org.au/what-we-do/species/northern-bettong/ :https://www.australianwildlife.org/endangered-northern-bettong-released-into-mount-zero-taravale-wildlife-sanctuary/ :https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/2787/115063540::
 * Sources:https://www.australianwildlife.org/wildlife/northern-bettong/ :https://wwf.org.au/what-we-do/species/northern-bettong/ :https://www.australianwildlife.org/endangered-northern-bettong-released-into-mount-zero-taravale-wildlife-sanctuary/ :https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/2787/115063540::