User:Oliviascott99/Octopus tetricus/Kvboyette Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Oliviascott99


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Octopus tetricus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of this article does begin with an opening sentence that gives the reader a good idea as to what the article is about, however, the lead does not include information from most of the sections that are included in the article. The main content of the article is very informative and doesn't draw conclusions or show signs of bias, however, the author could include more information in each section that is already present in the article and/or add some more sections regarding different aspects of this octopus. The information that was collected from the sources that were cited was accurately reflected in the paper, however, if the author found more sources that were available on the topic, more aspects of the life of this octopus could be described and further progress the information that was present in this article. I am not sure if the fisheries section really contributes much to the article, maybe if the author elaborated more on this section maybe it would be more relevant to the article. The strength of this article is in the habitat and behavior section of the article, yet more information could be added to this section. More information could be added to all of the other sections as well in order to really give the readers a well rounded understanding of this octopus.