User:Oliviascott99/Octopus tetricus/Sheridantaylor17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Oliviascott99


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Octopus tetricus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section might need another sentence or two as it doesn't reference the sections in the article. In the second sentence of the description I would would that differently or split it into 2 since you say which is used to twice in a row and it doesn't flow well. I would also put a link to a description of rufous arm faces since people won't know what that means. What is the closely related subspecies in the distribution paragraph? Instead of say common or scientific name. Did you find anything on taxonomy? The article has a good neutral point of view. This is a really good start and looks well laid out.