User:Omac77/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Travel technology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I love to travel and I am already familiar with some travel technology, like online bookings and travel agencies. This article is somewhat short, so I think a lot of improvements could be made.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is concise. It has a good introductory sentence. The lead section includes aspects of the contents and sub-headings in the article. The lead section mentions the definition of 'e-tourism', which is not mentioned in the article, so that could be a place for improvement. The content in the article is relevant to the topic. There a few examples of travel technology mentioned in the article, but there is room for more. The examples are up to date. There is content missing, like more explanations of more examples. This article does not address Wikipedia's equity gaps or topics related to underrepresented populations. The article is neutral in tone. There is no argumentative tone. The article only mentions facts about Travel Technology. It does have an underlying tone of being able to make things much easier for the common tourist. Other than that, there is no bias. In regard to sources, there are not many. Not every fact is backed by a source. In fact, many of the sections don't have a single fact sourced. There is lots of room for improvement here. Each of the links for the sources work, and the book links work too. There are only 3 'notes' for sources. I believe there are definitely better sources available, both peer-reviewed and not. This is a widespread topic that does not have an adequate Wikipedia page on it. The article is very easy to read and it flows well. There is not enough information in each section. The talk page is essentially non-existent. There is one comment from a user. I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Overall, this article has lots and lots of room for improvement and I think it's a great project.