User:Omavim/Rumex lapponicus/E.h.elhag Peer Review

General info

 * Omavim
 * Rumex lapponicus

Lead evaluation
The lead is updated to reflect the content added by the author of this article. The introductory sentence is relevant and concise to the article and presents the species very well. It does include all information that is later discussed in the article. I would suggest adding the sentence about where it is found to the distribution section instead.

Content evaluation
The content is all relevant to the topic and is up to date. There is no information that does not belong. It is all sectioned well.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is neutral and is not suggestive of anything that will favor or disagree with any information provided. Furthermore, all the information is written from an objective view allowing just facts to be stated. It does not attempt to persuade the reader in any shape or manner.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

Sources and references evaluation
All sources adequately back up the information and they are all thorough and current. All except for "Yukon Conservation Data Centre (January 2019). "Lapland Sorrel". Yukon Rare Plant Information Sheets." links are working to the sources provided.

Organization evaluation
The information is all really organized and there are no evident grammatical or spelling errors found. It is very well broken down into sections that represent the information being discussed.

Overall evaluation
The article is off to a great start. I believe the addition of the sentence from the lead added to the distribution section as well as further discussion on the description of the plant is suggested. The article is very well written and organized and is not in need of any major changes.