User:Omehrage/Feminism in India/Karamchand98 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Omehrage
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Omehrage/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes the lead has been updated to include new content by my peer.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes the opening sentence is strong and lays out what Omid will be discussing later in his article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The Lead includes an overall discussion of what Omid will be discussing, but no specific writing on the major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No it does not.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The Lead is concise but it is effective since it discusses the broad description about Personal Laws and women's rights.

Lead evaluation
Omid's Lead is concise but effectual because since it is broad, it has an overview about what the topic will be about, but what he can do is include a sentence or two about the topic sections in the Lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevant to his topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content added is up-to-date but there are no citations yet.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No there is not content that does not belong. The content is concise and provides all the information necessary for an opening.

Content evaluation
The content is specific to the topic and it is concise yet it discusses what the overall topic will discuss.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content is neutral as there is no bias to it.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There are no claims made in the article. Omid maintains neutrality in his writing.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are no overrepresented views, but Omid can discuss more about Articles 14 and 15.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No there is no persuasion in the piece, the neutrality is present and there is no bias either.

Tone and balance evaluation
Omid maintains a neutral tone and there is no bias in the piece. He gives an account of the information and that is all.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The sources are reliable as they JSTOR papers.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources are current, all are post 1990 and they reveal available literature on the topic as the journals reveal the information of women's rights in the nation.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * They all work and are reliable as they are academic papers and economic and political articles.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are all reliable because of their worth as papers and high-ranking articles. Omid utilizes extremely detailed sources in his topic.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content is clear and concise and draws the attention of the reader.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There are no spelling errors in the draft.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * I would say the Lead is organized but if Omid could add a bit more about Articles 14 and 15.

Organization evaluation
Organization of the article is well-done and Mid opens his piece up with a strong Lead as well.

Images and Media
There is no media or images added yet

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
This is not a new article.

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes because he goes into detail about women's rights in terms of Personal Laws.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * He discusses the overlapping topic of gender inequality and Personal Laws.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * He can discuss the history of the Personal Laws as well.

Overall evaluation
The article has a strong beginning, and Omid can add detail later but as of now his organizational skills are strong and causes the reader to be drawn to the material.