User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Phosphetene/Hienn211 Peer Review

General info
OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Phosphetene
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Phosphetene

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Leads

The first paragraph is the leads in this article. It presents the overview of the topic discussed in the page in concise manner. Brief history and general context along with applications are discussed. There are information that is not discussed in later article and concise enough to engage the audience.

Content

The content discussed in this article is relevant to the article by including nomenclature, synthesis, and several reactivity studies. They all contributes for a better understanding of topic of phosphetene for readers who are not familiar with. Examples provided in the synthesis section are articles in about 20 years ago, which might address an issue of outdated information. However, it is partially solved by adding a review article of phosphetene in 2021 as a reference. Thus, I do not think this is a major issue, but I prefer including a recent article if there is one. I also prefer more explanation about why reactions that are given in the article are important to describe your chose topic. This page does not deal with equity gap, so there is no problem on this perspective.

Tone and Balance

This article does not have biased opinion on any types of data. The information is delivered in cohesive and neutral tone. This is supported by providing multiple reference to neutralize one opinion in certain article to another.

Source and Referencing

There are decent amount of reference to support the idea, which is good. They are also from liable primary/secondary source (scientific journal). The link does work.

Organization

The flow is smooth, and it is easy to read. There was no major grammatical errors that I have seen so far.

Image and Media

I have a confirmation from the author to include several reaction scheme later. Other than that, I do not think any major issue for not take advantage of using figure and media to visualize discussion in this page.

For new article

There are several review article to summarize phosphetene, which correspond to the secondary or tertiary sources. There are many links to other Wikipedia articles to show the connection between the new article and other ideas.

Overall

This is well-written article and easy to follow the idea. By adding more figures and explaining importance in each reaction, the idea will be deliver better.