User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Phosphetene/Lipidmonolayer1 Peer Review

General info
OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Phosphetene
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead to the article does a good job of concisely explaining the article’s structure in broad strokes. Perhaps the sentence on the types of reactions that phosphatenes undergo can be truncated but other than that, great job.

The content of the article is relevant to the page topic. It also does a good job keeping the perspective neutral. The varied sentence structure in the synthesis portion also makes it more engaging for readers. The content of this article seems to derive quite a bit from older papers from the 80s and 90s. However, the use of the recent review paper probably keeps it up-to-date.

Overall, the page is well-written and easy to read. Adding images for the remaining reactions would help improve comprehensibility. As for the existing captions, they do a good job explaining the reactions depicted. The graphics are also good quality. They’re also laid out in a way that makes the flow of the article seamless.

Great job!