User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Tantalocene trihydride/Hienn211 Peer Review

General info
OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:OneMustImagineAGradStudentHappy/Tantalocene trihydride
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
It is straightforward and easy to follow. The chembox looks concise.

Synthesis
It looks good to me. Unless you directly mention about the image from a paragraph, you may want to add caption. Despite this, I do not have any issues on not having a caption.

Characterization
Does "τ = 11.63" refer to chemical shift? You may want to add unit (i.e., ppm). Other contents looks good to me.

Reactivity
For C-H activation section, I suggest you linking wikipage for π-complex and σ-complex in case reader want to know what it is. Or, you may draw each complex to describe. Other sections looks good to me.

Reference
They are all in primary source and relevant to your topic. Citation is appropriately used in text, so it is easier to understand and trust the source.

Overall
Overall structure of the page is well-organized, and the context is well-written. You may want to add more images or links to connect your topic with other sources. The tone is neutral, and no major grammatical error was found. Good article and each to read!