User:OppsieDaisy/Ghoul/PyroMythology Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Username OppsieDaisy)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OppsieDaisy/Ghoul?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ghoul

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * The content added is certainly relevant, adding in additional details such as more information on the origins of ghouls, how they were viewed by different peoples, and how other people/cultures interpreted them differently as time went on.
 * Tone is professional and consistent with the material of the article.
 * The added content does need to have its in-text citations included within the text, but the references are present on the page.
 * For the most part, the added information simply needs formatting, in-text citations, and to fix some grammar and spelling issues.

The heading font actually adds that pretty line, it will also provide a drop down tab on mobile screens for easier reading.
The added content is overall very good, and worth adding to the article. Some suggestions I would have for formatting is relatively simple. Create a topic/paragraph focus and use the Heading/Subheading fonts to define the content of the paragraph. It is quite easy to do, and is visually pleasing. It can also help you to format the entire article, making it easier for readers to understand and digest.