User:Orangeorange123/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

An article on Geology: 2005 Azores subtropical storm

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this because it is a short article and won't take long to evaluate. My preliminary impression is that it is well organized.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: I think this article provides a good lead section. It starts by giving some basic information and then gives some more details.

Content: The content sections are well balanced and the images add to the article.

Tone and Balance: The tone seems balanced and the article does not appear biased to me. This makes sense as the article is on a storm and not on a fiery topic like politics or history.

Sources and References: Even though it's a short article there are several sources that appear to be referenced correctly. There is also some suggested reading.

Organization and writing quality: The article is organized very well and I find it easy to follow. The writing quality is high and I didn't find any errors on what I read.

Images and media: There are only two images in the article but they are more than enough. The first is an aerial shot of the storm at its peak and the second is a "map plotting the track and intensity of the storm." Source: image caption.

Talk page discussion: There is lots going on in the talk section. The current status is a featured article and is part of two current WikiProjects. There's some talk about the naming of the article, whether the storm should even have an article, a dead link, etc. This does relate to the Wiki Edu course so far.

Overall Impressions: I think this is a good article that is well written, has lots of citations, and is a featured article which I think speaks to its quality.