User:Oreo25/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The Wikipedia article about the Amazon Basin is quite short in length, as it mainly focuses on the location of the Amazon basin, its shape and a brief history of its origin. The article does not mention anything irrelevant to the topic nor anything distracting, but it could definitively be improved. The article could also mention the various types of wildlife and plant-life that it hosts. The article could also mention if the area is populated by people, the role of area in a historic and financial context and any problems that might be occurring for example climate change. Scientific information is provided accurately based on my personal research, and the article contains many links to other Wikipedia articles explaining many mentioned topics, even though some links have non existent articles. The tone is definitely neutral, without any claims that are biased towards a particular position, or any viewpoints that are over-presented or under-presented. Concerning the sources there are two references and one bibliography, I can confirm that the first reference is a non-existent article and the second reference is an original article and its a reliable reference from an unbiased source. Finally I cannot access the bibliography, the link is not working.

The article is part of the wiki Project Geology and the wiki Project South America, both of which are characterized as low importance and rated Stub-class. So, the definition of stub means that the article is too short for the standards of an encyclopedia and requires more details. The talk page has only one comment asking about the Brazilian Shield, so not a lot of conversations taking place on the talk page.