User:Organism438/Deafness in Italy/Joanet23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Organism438


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Deafness in Italy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content
- The information provided is very relevant to the topic and contains relevant and up-to-date data.

- For History of Deaf Rights section, not too sure how it is directly related to Italy or how it affected Italy. What other countries did the Milan Congress affect?

- For Significant Organizations, looks like there is only one citation throughout the entire paragraph. I'm not sure if this is an actual issue but there are parts that aren't cited.

Organization
-Very well organized and each section and point is laid out in a very clear way.

Tone and Balance
- Tone is very neutral and information is provided in a very factual way

Sources and References
- All information is backed up by citations to a certain extent, there are parts where claims are made and no citations are present.

- Content is good reflection of what the sources state, are pretty current and reliable. Authors aren't very diverse with first-hand experience as a deaf person but this is also very rare to come across.

- Not too many journals or published studies from what I looked at and sources are more composed of websites.

Overall
Very well written article backed up with lots of good information. Very thorough look into each topic.