User:Organizedchaos39/Dual consciousness/MKP24 Peer Review

General info
Organizedchaos39
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Organizedchaos39/Dual consciousness
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dual consciousness:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

The content added seems relevant to the topic because it is a result of dual consciousness and involves hand movements that are not in conscious control. The history section was a very significant contribution since it gives the readers an idea of how this idea came about in the first place. The sentence on switching attention between tasks was also a nice touch since it gives clarification on why control of the hand is minimized. I feel like I would like to see some more contributions to this article about more explanations for dual consciousness in terms of psychology and neuroscience. It is a complex topic and more explanations can help readers understand this concept better. That is totally your call though.

Tone:

Fact based and no biased language.

Sources:

You added relevant and up to date sources. I know this concept has a history so older resources are available but I wonder if any more recent research or experiments have been conducted on this topic.

Organization:

It is clearly written and easy to read. I feel like the section on the different types of AHS could be moved under a different subheading. Does not feel like it belongs in the history section.

Overall Impressions:

I believe you did a great job and added more weight to the AHS section. It allows us to see how the idea of dual consciousness came to be through initial presentations of this syndrome. I feel like maybe adding a recent study using the dual consciousness theory can help readers comprehend how the dual consciousness theory guides certain research, interventions, and has implications in recent times.