User:Orlady/Stuff I'm working on/Sand2


 * February 2008: User talk:Nyjockboy2 - A Jvolkblum sock opens a conversation with another Jvolkblum sock, suggesting that many people are upset by the behavior of HMishkoff. The second Jvolkblum sock agrees with the other that HMishkoff is abusive. Then there are these diffs in which the two different Jvolkblum socks posted on HMishkoff's talk page.


 * May 2008: Sockpuppet BronxBEAT personalizes the sockpuppetry editing issues as being all about Orlady


 * July 2008: User talk:Giggy/Archive/July 2008 - by James Conoco, in which this sock claims to be an innocent victim of persecution. Followed by User talk:BlueAzure (by Giggy). User:BlueAzure disappeared from Wikipedia in August 2008.


 * February 2009: On Tiptoety's talk page, Wknight94 expresses frustration over the Jvolkblum situation, but gets the reaction that banned users' contributions should not necessarily be deleted. Wknight94 "retired" in March 2009.


 * February 2009: In User_talk:Doncram/Archive 7, an anonymous IP says of Wknight94: "This is one of the ways that this user removes information unfairly from the site. He seems to act as if he is above the wiki protocol. His actions are hostile and spiteful and add nothing but negativity to the issue(s) at hand. I would venture to say that he himself is turning non-issues into 'battlegrounds' and not the other way around as he claims. As for his other contributions to the site, well, they are minimal and barely beneficial to the site."


 * April 2009: Anonymous IP posting on DoxTxob's user talk page. In part, it says: "Orlady is continuing to ignore the calls for dialogue & resolution, hounding over New Rochelle related articles, and making countless trivial, unproductive edits in what only can be explained as a profound desire to provoke other users + get them involved in petty arguments. Now an interesting new twist has arisen - intersting but certainly far from surprising - Orlady, the expert on IP addresses + world-wide user tracking, mysteriously has come across the IP address of a user who has claimed to be Jvolkblum violating their userban, making that admission after working on one of her targeted NR articles, Wildcliff ( specifically proving the validity of the articles content in its entirety by the NRHP nomination form and disproving Orladys baloney arguments)...... so in essence, this user had proven her definitvely wrong and then admits to being a banned user who has no rights to contribute to the site so then their contributions would be immediately reverted???? Thats the shadiest course of events if you ask me. . . + they conveniently work in Orladys favor? putting her back in the "right" to revert the user edits "as per wiki policy"? This same anonymous user randomly deleted a section of information from the main NR, NY article which Orlady herself has wanted to remove in the past. Once this info was removed she made NO attempt to correct the blatant vandalism (strange for someone who proudly surveys every edit and every user) but was first to go after an individual who had restored it themselves (claiming sockpuppett, banned user, blahblah)."


 * April 2009: Jvolkblum posts on his talk page, including insinuations about me. Wknight94 also noticed the stylistic similarities.