User:Ortiz.carolina/Christensenella/LD2023 Peer Review

General info
Ortiz.carolina
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ortiz.carolina/Christensenella
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Christensenella

Evaluate the drafted changes
This has been edited following some additions by the user.

The lead is very concise and includes important information provided in the body. All of the content is relevant to the topic. Some of the information might be missing a source however. The table providing characteristics specific to this microbe is really beneficial to the article. There are only two sources which hampers the article and one on them has an issue with the date I believe. The classification part is beneficial and well made.