User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2008

Re:hey
Hey Beano, good to hear from you. I'm pretty much a semi-editor now. I check Wikipedia on a regular basis, but mostly as a reader. I'll make the occasional correction but I haven't done any real maintenance work in a while. I've thought about coming back to do it, like process AfDs and such, perhaps I'll do it when I have more time... --Deathphoenix ʕ 15:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Nikki Jane article
Hey Beano. Nikki Jane is an artist featured on the upcoming Noah's Arc Movie: Jumping The Broom. She is credible. Please google this movie, and tracklisting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanXzavier (talk • contribs) 06:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Thank you so much. What exactly do you think i need to add to the page? The only credit she has now is the Movie. How do I make it Credible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanXzavier (talk • contribs) 06:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Ok, so I need to find an online article that features her name in it? Do I put the article up on there? Lastly, when you google Nikki Jane does anything on your computer come up about her being on the Noah's Arc: Jumping the Broom (soundtrack)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanXzavier (talk • contribs) 06:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * So if there is a article presented on MySpace, can I use that as a referenced citation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanXzavier (talk • contribs) 06:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Beano, Are the references notable? RyanXzavier (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Smoki People
The Smoki People organization was started in 1921 when there were only 5000 residents in the town of Prescott Arizona.

Over 500 of those residents - men and women alike were members.

If you go to the reference you'll get lots more information about the Smoki People and the Smoki Museum they started.

EoGuy (talk)EoGuy Not Replied. Page has already been deleted, which addressed the issue 

Puzzled of France writes...
Hi

I wrote an entry on Eddie Borysewicz and you tagged it for speedy removal because, if I understand you right, the references link back to the original page. Maybe I've done something wrong. When I wrote it, the links went to lots of different sources. If you can help, I'll happily put it right. Thanks for your interest. Les woodland (talk) 07:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)les woodland ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Eddie Borysewicz
Please consider a little before tagging articles for speedy. Your tagging of this article ia extremely innapropriate. Lack of citations is not grounds for speedy deletion. In any case the article is littered with cites, the author had just not got round to putting in the ref template so they were visible. Also CSD:R1 does not apply to the situation where citations are pointing to an innapropriate place (which they are not), only where the page itself is redirecting to an innapropriate place. For someone who is doing so much speedy tagging you ought to make yourself a bit more familiar with the rules before you cause Wikipedia to lose good articles.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  09:26, 12 October 2008 ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * It is beside the point whether or not you could see the references, even if there were none it is not grounds for a speedy. Learn the rules before placing more tags in future.  There have just been too many good editors who have come to Wikipedia with a great deal to contribute only to be disheartened and leave when their first experience is an unprovoked deletion which they often do not understand how to challenge.  Speedies are for clear-cut cases only.  If there is any doubt (you said yourself "the person seems credible") you should assume good faith and not a speedy it.  The correct venue when speedy does not apply is WP:AfD, but even there, in this case, I think they would have told you it is not a candidate for deletion.  And please, can I have a meaningful heading when you post on my page - I could hardly work out what you were replying to.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  21:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Eddie B
I see what you mean about the references not working. I can't explain why because I did what I always do. I'll have a look at the instructions page and see what's wrong. Meanwhile, any guidance would be useful. Les woodland (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)les woodland ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Al Ciner
Why did you nominate Al Ciner for A7? He has 2 notable bands. Special K (KoЯn flakes) 18:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage. Not Replied.''' Accidental. I though I replied to this message. '''

Um, no you didn't. Special  K (KoЯn flakes) 12:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Okay, thanks for that. Special  K (KoЯn flakes) 16:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Péter Kollár
I correct the article. Doncsecz (talk) 09:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Re: Artical Deletion
Hello. I am the person who wrote the page on Static Skyline. I do not think that there is any justified reason to delete our page therefor doing so would achive nothing. please tell me why you think the page should be deleted. Jake Honey Static Skyline —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcus789 (talk • contribs) 09:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

George Michael
All right, no problem, i'll try and find a reliable source, but just one thing i don't understand, and that is when i chose a source, how would i know if its reliable or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.162.177 (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * No problem, thanks, i think i will not work on it as for today(mybe tommorow), but just got one request, and thats if we can keep in touch about this issue, because if i have already strated talking this through with you than i would also rather continue talking this through with you and that i will be able to send you a few more messages. Is this possible?(talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC).  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Hello Beano, how are you? In continue to our conversation from yesterday, i was wondering if the following link would be considered as a reliable referance?(http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-georgemichael14-2008jun14,1,7287216.story)(talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC).  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Hello Beano, iv'e got a few more references, please tell me when youv'e got time for me and talk them through, and see if they are suitable enough.(talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.160.74 (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thank you.Yes, my IP does seem to change all the time.My other source that i would like to know about, is a one that i am not really sure about, but its this one http://upload.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=4927320097&ShowSims=Y Waiting for your answer to know if it's suitable or not.(talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC).  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Hello Beano, i would just like to remind you about our conversation a few days ago about George Michael and the sources i had showed you.(talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.197.69 (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

So can i use the previous source iv'e showed you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.197.69 (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Deletion of Orang & Bronze
I would suggest to please quickly look up the official site and/or google and yahoo for the company profiles. Your are quick in tagging a deletion, i hope that you are also quick on checking the validity of the article's contents..Hope to settle this now. Supremo106 (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * Can't you see the official website? or at least try searching Google or Yahoo....the page is not yet completed and its references are not yet finished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supremo106 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * I have erased contents that are "Advertisements" in nature..could all of you review it it at least. Thanks. Supremo106 (talk) 01:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Your requests on WP:RFPERM
"Progressing down the road to adminship"?

Earlier today, I made a post about what adminship is like, and I would encourage you to read it. Seriously, adminship is not all it's cracked up to be. If you are involving yourself in areas of this project simply to make yourself more attractive at a future RFA, you will be be disappointed if and when you get the tools. In addition to this, there is a very pervasive atmosphere of so-called "career Wikipedians", who are only here to "move up the ladder", not build an encyclopedia. Intentional or not, your requests make it seem like you are one of these people. Most users at RFA will frown on users who actively try to become admins.

The best way to become an admin is to just be yourself and do what you enjoy doing. Sooner or later, if you have a need for the tools, someone will ask you if you want to run. J.delanoy gabs adds 03:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * Hey thanks for the message. I read the article you provided. As far as the quote goes, I wrote differently than what I meant. I don't do all the contributing just so I can become a sysop. What I meant was that if being granted these privelages would help me fight vandalism easier. If I am nominated for adminship someday, I would accept and would like the idea of becoming one. Like I said, those privelages I am applying for is not 100% imperative to me. I fight vandalism, patrol new pages, and participate in AFD discussions because I have fun when I do it. Either way, it's not a big deal. Sorry if I sounded that way, though. Oshwah (talk) 04:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, in that case, please accept my apologies. I unfortunately have an unnerving tendency to jump to conclusions sometimes, and there^^ you go. Again, sorry. J.delanoy gabs adds  04:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Aap Kaa Suroor 2 - Ae Himesh Bhai
Inre the AFD, The film has been made. You can watch the bloopers and download the music. i found it on Google. Definitely not WP:Crystal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 05:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

"New message" bar
Hello Beano, as you may have noticed I removed the fake “new message” bar from your userpage. Contrary to what you may think, I did in fact purposefully remove it. The reason I removed it is because it is disruptive, and in no way serves as something that betters the encyclopedia. As you will notice here, WP:USERPAGE allows for me to remove any content I deem disruptive, and here it clearly states that Simulated MediaWiki interfaces (such as the “new message” bar) should be avoided. In hopes of avoiding a edit war, I politely ask you to remove the spoof from your userpage. Thanks, Tiptoety  talk 18:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * Thank you, much appreciated. And I have no problem with you keeping a copy of your mainpage template somewhere. Tiptoety  talk 19:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thank you for vandalism report
Hi! Thanks for sending a message to the IP address that vandalized my Colby O'Donis article... I appreciate it. Bmedick (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Re:Quick Question
You've been doing fine so far... I would suggest that you look over the current and past candidates for RFAs and see what people are looking for in successful RFAs (conversely, you can see what people consider to be negative in unsuccessful ones). I'm pretty sure specific standards have changed somewhat from when I had an RFA, but the general qualities have probably still the same. Looking at more recent RFAs will give you an idea. Also, members often disagree on what are positive qualities for admins. If you have time, you could also check out (and possibly contribute to) the current RFA discussion. Best of luck! --Deathphoenix ʕ 02:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Go meat
I recently receved notice that my article "Go meat" may be deleted so I have an account on wikipedia and Im starting to learn how to write a page for wikipedia. One day I heard some people talking about this go meat thing and disided to look it up on wikipedia as soon as I had time. So when I arived home and searched .nothing came up, so disapointed I searched google for some answers, then I disided to take some of the quick info that I had learned and add it to wikipedia and add a link to the hillshire farm article. so that if others wanted to know more they could visite that article. I disagree that this article should be deleted but could you tell me your thoughts on how it could be changed so that it could stay. Also if you have any Ideas for the article could you send them as well or add them yourself to the article. please help. Parkoursquirrel (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * hello beano. thank you very much for your response. I just have a couple remaining questions for you. 1. Do you think that the go meat article is a wikipedia worthy article, and if so how would I fix it so that it could be wikipedia worthy and what to add to make it worthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parkoursquirrel (talk • contribs) 02:00, 29 October 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

sorry
Its just that ive never used wikipedia and my friends said that you could edit the pages but i dident belive them so i tried it but then i moved it myself anyway so sorry about that 78.146.217.143 (Talk) 08:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Duetscha
I'm sorry, but I've messed up. The Deutscha article was listed twice, I attempted to delete one, but seem to have deleted both and can't find a way to undelete the deletion. Can you re-add the rationale for deletion or does this need an admin? Mjroots (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Yay! found a way myself, undone the damage! Mjroots (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

[No Subject]
Hey, don't touch stuff that doesn't belong to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.178.112.62 (talk) 02:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)  Not Replied. as message seemed retaliatory from a vandalism revert 

Beano what did I tell you? I am disappointed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.178.112.62 (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

It was added by students who attend the school. Just because they didn't cite it does not mean it isn't credible. ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

i go to the school. ho wam i supposed to cite it? my name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by C nosam (talk • contribs) 02:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

why did you delete my comm3nt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.182.89 (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

New message
✅ Replied on your talkpage.

heh
oh comon man - can't a guy have a little fun? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.83.61 (talk) 06:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)  Not Replied.  

dear beano. you are young. how did you get to be an editor? thanks for your concern. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniepetrusa (talk • contribs) 06:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

edit reverted?
hi, i just realize that i forgot to comment the last edit i made, where i removed an un-cited fact and added the "weasel words" template to an unsubstantiated claim. is that why you reverted my edit? -- best,

Jm3 (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Sister projects
You may wish to usurp the name "Beano" on Sister Projects - there appears to be a vandalism-only account by that name, on at least Meta, Wikinews, and Wiktionary. Cirt (talk) 11:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

hi
hi..

cant we have a grafitti page where we can change whatever we want? that would be fun..

and it might make people stop vandalising pages...

byeee WRITE BACK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.109.76.7 (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Recommended Ban
Recommended ban for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/59.101.122.4 for repeated vandalism of Skin page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atosecond (talk • contribs) 05:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

No Subject
You're always beating me to it by under a second. Is there any way for non-admins to revert to an earlier version in one click? I always have to undo multiple changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atosecond (talk • contribs) 06:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thanks
Thanks for reverting my user page twice. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

RE:
Thank you 45Factoid44 (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Vandalism Revert
Sorry but I think wires have been crossed. The original title of the worldwide first edition of the book is Ten Little Niggers and that is what I reversed the unidentified contributors change to a few minutes ago.✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * Now our wires are crossing!! Thanks for the message!!--Jtomlin1uk (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)✅ Replied on your talkpage.

No subject
Please read the third paragraph of the article i vandelized, its not right. I'm just trying to point it out, but your to stupid to see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.166.246.26 (talk) 23:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Do you mind...
if I use your ? I'm too lazy to type that out each time, or to create one of my own. Cheers.  Im per a t § r (Talk) 01:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Sorry for peter
Won't happen again, just a lame joke —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.12.127 (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

sierra sinn revert
hi this is "sierra sinn" and i updated my wikipedia for you so that it would be more accurate! and i certainly do not appreciate you removing my edit!

i do not want it to only have my "porn awards" as i am not a porn star! anymore and i feel that you are stifling my character and that your site is a gross misrepresentation of who i am!

i would greatly appreciate it if you would kindly replace the edit i added to MY wikipedia page.

if this is an issue you can contact me via myspace

myspace.com/xxxsierrasinnxxx

thanks again!

sincerely yours, "sierra sinn" The smartest person alive (talk) 02:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

George Michael
Hello beano, it is me that not very long ago had a whole conversation with you about George Michael and the mention of his partly Jewish mum in his article. I did what i agreed with you that i will only source that with a third side referance, and so i did(used the referance from the LA times you confirmed me). Even though, the things i edit get deleted all the time, and the users who do so would not even talk to me or at least explain me why, so i decided to aproach you, and would be happy if you came back to me with it. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.187.184 (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * OK, than i will have further problems than i will make contact with you. Thanks. Not Replied.  


 * Hello Beano, it's me again. I am really sorry that i have to bother you with this once again, but it's the same old George Michael problem once again.The users who delete my edits despite me using a reliable source and editing accordind to Wikipedia's editing policy, still don't really discuss the issue through on the discussion page (user "Ckatz" and "Mark Harris") and decide what is rellevant and what isn't when a consensus is yet to be reached. ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

No problem, by the way the personal attacks on the talk page are by another IP user and not by me.The thing is that i did try do send them a message be they would just not reply.

Re:SC taskforce
You wanted to know if there were any articles in particular that could use some help in relation to StarCraft, so here's some ideas. Most of the game articles, as you can already see are already reasonably high quality. StarCraft II could use some expansion in some areas, the development section in particular is rather lacking and the whole thing needs a thorough copyedit. However, bits like StarCraft Adventures and StarCraft: The Board Game are in desperate need of someone who knows something about them and can provide sources for them. StarCraft Adventures has been a stub for two years. If you know anything about them, working on those articles would be great. There's also List of locations in the StarCraft series, which needs a major cleanup to meet notability (through development and reception information), referencing and MoS standards, if you fancy something on the fiction. In addition, there's StarCraft professional competition, which could again use the attention of someone who knows something about it. If you want something on the technical side of things, MPQ could probably use a hand. Take your pick from the lot, there's plenty to go around. Enjoy! -- Sabre (talk) 20:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.


 * Looks good, I certainly think that the board game article can be pushed further in quality with the necessary background and reception information with someone working on it. Alternity on the other hand, I could never find any sources for that beyond its existance, and it looks like you've got the same problem. I think we may have to consider merging it unless significant coverage sources can be produced. -- Sabre (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Re:Vandalism Revert
Actually, I was undoing the vandalism. I was patrolling recent changes and I was undoing it cause somebody else vandalised the page. I probably clicked on something by accident. ♣ Princess  Clown  ♥ 01:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

why?
why did you revert my comment on hurburt miller? his last words really were: "let Chuck Norris know i love him" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.33.80 (talk) 01:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)   Not Replied. Retaliation to vandalism revert 

why dude
porque es tu houndin on me bro —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.171.178.84 (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)   Not Replied. Retaliation to vandalism revert 

just curious
Hey, you reverted an edit I did on my userpage thinking it was vandalism... I'm just completely curious as to why you did that revert (lol). Not mad at all, just completely curious. :) If you could reply at my talk page that'd be great... just don't revert it! :P (just teasing) Mr. Old-Skool (talk) 02:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.
 * LOL computers aren't always as smart as they think they are. Well, it's good to hear that you are very diligent in reverting vandalism (I've seen you around, reverting things)... So I think it's appropriate I recorgnize your efforts:


 * PS: Could you tell me where to get the anti-vandalism tool? I would find it to be very useful. Thanks! - Mr. Old-Skool (talk) 21:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Re: Vandalism revert
✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Recent changes
Hi Beano, I just spent a couple of hours to edit Wiki, based on reasearch and a book I read. None of the stuff I put in was 'marketing' of any sort - it simply put some links in to for example Project Management Office, 'see also' section to Project stakeholders and there I edited the article that only states ONE way of looking at stakeholders. The edit I put in referred to a professor from Harvard Business School and a book I read (about project stakeholders). I have ZERO affiliation with these, other than understanding that stakeholders can be categorized in a more focused way and with this focus one can get much better project success rates. Isn't this what Wiki is for? Let me know how I can share this with the Wiki community or what exactly was the reason for deleting my change? Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapador (talk • contribs) 17:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)  ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thanks Beano for the the quick reply. Yes, as I was editing the page, at one point I did put an email id on the page (then I removed it, so the latest version didn't have it). Under the 'references' section the way it is constructed, one of the fields is 'Author contact' and I filled it out with the author's email (I got that from a webpage a while ago - he has nothing to do with me...). But then I removed it because I figured he may not want emails coming to him from Wiki... So how do I put my changes back simply (without having to spend another 2 hours)? HELP!!! Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapador (talk • contribs) 17:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thanks for the explanation! Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapador (talk • contribs) 17:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Jay Gluck page.
Beano,

I'm working on updating references on Jay Gluck.

At the same time, please refer to the following WIkipedia page mentioning him by name:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Upham_Pope.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellingluck (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Reversion
Yeah, I tried to click cancel but Huggle seized up... that never happens on my computer, but I am on my slow as hell laptop at the moment. Thanks for quickly reverting! :) &mdash; neuro(talk) 23:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

lol
it was funny —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.62.102 (talk) 03:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)   Not Replied.  

Beano at it.wiki
It.wiki username Beano is now available for your global account. Ciao, Ary29 (talk) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Re
Re: this. Nice to meet you too! :) — Ed   17  (Talk /  Contribs)  21:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Thank you
Thank you for reverting my edit in Party.Reverted it to a wrong version.Wanted to revert it to where user:DMacks as the article had been vandalised in many edits.Thanks again.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

The history of the Taj Hotel
Hi! I just deleted this page and closed its AFD section. It was copied directly from the hotel's website. In the future, if you want to propose a merge, it's more appropriate to do it in the pages to be merged. See Help:Merging and moving pages for details! Best, FreplySpang 01:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) ✅ Replied on your talkpage.

Merry Christmas!
✅ Replied on your talkpage.