User:Oski999/sandbox

User:Ndieu/sandbox

= Article Evaluation = "Page evaluated: Chemical reactor"The article talked through the basic ideas and designs of a chemical reactor, such as primary types and key process variables. The contents are very explicit, and it is very helpful to provide the pictures beside the paragraphs to help the audiences visualize the actual reactor. However, I do find the organization of the introduction of different types of reactor sometimes confusing. And some aspects and topics for those reactors should be further developed.

The tones in general are very professional, but understandable at the same time, which is desirable. For some reactor types such as the semi-batch reactor and the catalytic reactor, the article did not explain those in great details. It would be better if the author could provide detailed information for everything that he or she wants to introduce, such as more diagrams or pictures.

The references of the article are either from journals or books, which are all certified and authoritative citations. However, some links direct to the information of the book or the article, which are not instantly readable.

In the talk page, a lot of discussions are orientated toward certain phrases in the sections. It seems really important because the accurate phrase can help people understand the content better and be more clear about what the author is trying to convey.