User:Osuprunchik/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Bond order


 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content is relevant to the topic and it is written neutrally. Not every claim on the article has a citation. The citations are reliable but there aren't that many citations.


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * E–Z notation


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article content is relevant to the topic but there isn't very much information on the topic and thus only has one citation for the article. The content is written neutrally though.


 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article content is very detailed and relevant to the topic and it is written neutrally. It even has the chemical shifts shown. Most of the claims have reliable looking citations attached to them. There wasn't much discussion on the articles talk page, mainly just a clarification and a better spectra example.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Standard solution


 * Article Evaluation
 * This articles content is relevant to the topic but it isn't written very clearly for people to understand. one of the comments in the talk section was "i think that this is full of crap and that they should put information on that would actually help somebody" which makes me think that it wasn't very helpful in how to understand the topic or use and create standard solutions. The information was not cited and there was only one citation which may be the reason why it isn't written very well because the author may have been trying to paraphrase one source for the whole article.


 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Rozen's reagent


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is very short and describes what rozens reagent is and describes briefly how it was generated. The content is relevant to the topic but it is lacking information. The information is well cited.


 * Sources