User:Osuprunchik/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Bond order
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I am familiar with the topic.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? it describes Bond order but I don't think it describes it well enough.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? It does briefly
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes it does.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is not concise and out of order

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? the content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date? The page was last updated on November 2019
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes there is content that might not belong.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? The content is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no biased opinions
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It doesn't persuade

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The information is mostly backed up but is lacking a little on sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? they are thorough and reflect the available literature.
 * Are the sources current? Most of the sources are current, there is however one from 1947 and one from 1997
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Some do

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The article is hard to read for me.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? none that I caught
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The article could have been broken down a little more and put in some more clear details.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There is no images and there should be to explain the concept, but there is a depiction of the bond order equation.
 * Are images well-captioned? they are not captioned
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The conversations work to try to make the article accurate and more easy to read.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? it is of mid importance in stub class.part of the WikiProject Chemistry
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The articles overall status was a stub class mid level importance.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved? It could be written in a more concise easy thread and understand way.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is poorly developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: . Osuprunchik (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)