User:Ottawa10/Google Classroom/Volt101 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Ottawa10)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Ottawa10/Google Classroom - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Google Classroom - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * The leads have not been upgraded; however, the edits do not require updating the lead.

Content:


 * More details were added to the paragraphs. The information was also updated to reflect academic research from the past year, 2020. Considering the topic, one must take into account the volatility and rate of change of the program. The edits reflect such changes in the best way possible. However, as early as a few months ago, Google Classroom published a few more changes to the program. This highlights the daunting task of keeping this topic up to date. All content added were information and relevant to the topics. The article was edited to avoid plagiarism and the edited version did a great job at navigating this. The user also created a chart for one of the sections which creates a better visual depiction of the timeline.  The claims seem to all be accurate and non-biased. I do feel that the language might be a little too difficult to read for some. The added content provides more information and does not sway the reader in any direction. All new content is sourced. The links work well and all lead to the videos. The sources are relevant, but as spoken earlier, with an ever-changing program, it is difficult to continually provide up to date information. This article make-over was much needed. Thank you for taking the time to update this page.