User:OutskirtAZ/Oxnard strike of 1903

Before The Strike
Since these contractors had already caused minor slowdowns and protests over wages, recently arrived bank owners and merchants organized an owner-interest oriented contracting company called the Western Agricultural Contracting Company (WACC). The WACC quickly replaced the Japanese contractors as principal contractors to the Oxnard Plain and even forced some of them to subcontract through the WACC. <*This process adversely affected farmworkers as well as the WACC charged them a fee for subcontracting beneath them. Additionally, the WACC regularly refused to pay laborers in cash and instead compensated them with credit for company stores which often sold goods at unreasonably high prices .*> Comprising more than 90 percent of the work force, the WACC had a near monopoly of the workers. <*The WACC comprised of two distinct departments, one tasked with the oversight of Japanese laborers and labor contractors and another tasked with the oversight of Mexican laborers and labor contractors. Workers under both of these departments were displeased by the conduct of the WACC and. As a result, a large group of Japanese farmworkers and labor contractors organized a meeting at the beginning of February 1903 where they discussed their outrage at the working conditions and low wages under the WACC. *>

The Strike and the JMLA
On February 11, 1903, 500 Japanese and 200 Mexican laborers became the charter members of the Japanese-Mexican Labor Association (JMLA) joined together and formed their organization based on the grievances of the Oxnard laborers.  Overcoming obvious language barriers between the two constituent groups, they immediately elected Kosaburo Baba (president), Y. Yamaguchi (secretary of the Japanese branch), and J.M. Lizarras (secretary of the Mexican branch); Baba and Lizarras were both labor contractors and Yamaguchi has been recognized as a boarding student recruited from San Francisco. Their immediate concerns opposed the WACC on three conditions:


 * they accused the WACC of artificially suppressing wages;
 * they opposed the subcontracting system arguing that it forced workers to pay double commissions; and
 * they called for the freedom to buy goods rather than be subjected to the inflated prices of the company store.

In order to remedy these issues, the JMLA membership ceased working through the WACC (essentially declaring a strike). The strike came at a serendipitously precarious time in the sugar beet season, the staple crop of Oxnard Plain agriculture, since the labor-intensive and yield-defining work of thinning the seedlings needed to be done within the scope of a few weeks. <By refusing to work through the WACC during the thinning of sugar beet crops, the JMLA essentially challenged the backbone of financial operations in the Oxnard Plain. By refusing to work through the WACC, laborers who participated in the strike threatened the profits of the owners of the WACC, the American Beet Sugar Company, and the farm owners themselves. As a result, their actions were met with hostile responses from local newspapers as well as from the leadership of the American Beet Sugar Company. Colonel Driffil, manager of the American Beet Sugar Company, formally declared the company's support for the WACC and threatened to drive those who participate in the strike "out of the country." Outside of their own membership and other local Mexican and Japanese residents, the JMLA found little support from the white community in Oxnard outside of a few opportunistic merchants who saw the strike as a chance to disrupt WACC operations. >

By the first week in March, the JMLA recruited a membership larger than 1,200 workers (over 90% of the labor force of the county's beet industry). The JMLA's increased recruitment pulled the WACC's former contracted workers from it and essentially brought the sugar industry to a standstill. <Along with the withholding of labor in the sugar beet fields, the JMLA staged large demonstrations and marches in Oxnard, displaying the union's strength in numbers. In response to these displays of power, the WACC formed an alternative union known as the Independent Agricultural Labor Union (IALU) with the intention of undercutting the JMLA's efforts during the second and third weeks of March. The IALU worked in conjunction with the WACC as a strikebreaking organization which sought to restore regular working conditions in the sugar beet fields rather than advocate for the rights of local farm laborers. >

On March 23, 1903, the strike reached its turning point. <During a confrontation between the JMLA and IALU strikebreakers in Oxnard's Chinatown, shots were fired in the area of the confrontation, wounding two Japanese and two Mexican members of the JMLA. Luis Vasquez, a Mexican member of the JMLA, was killed by the gunfire. Initial reports released by local newspapers blamed the JMLA for the violence and exchange of gunfire; however, a statement released by the JMLA in the following days asserted that union members were not armed at the confrontation, pointing out that no union members had been arrested. The sole arrest from the confrontation was that of Deputy Constable Charles Arnold for the murder of Luis Vasquez. At a subsequent coroner's inquest to determine Arnold's role in the murder saw the testimonies of 50 witnesses, many of which contradicted one another with certain witnesses claiming they had observed Arnold firing at Vasquez and others claiming that Arnold had not even raised his gun at the confrontation. After a series of contradictory witness accounts, the county coroner requested that more Japanese witnesses speak at the following days of the inquest. However, the all-white male jury refused to continue the inquest as they had reached a verdict with the given evidence. The jury found Charles Arnold innocent in the murder of Luis Vasquez and he was cleared of all charges. >



<Following the deadly skirmish in Chinatown, JMLA representatives met with representatives of local farmers as well as the WACC to engage in negotiations. During the first two days of negotiations, the JMLA made it clear that they would refuse to end the strike until the WACC ended their monopoly over Oxnard Plain sugar beet operations and allow workers to contract directly with local farmers. The strike reached an official end on March 30, 1903 after the WACC agreed to cancel all standing contracts with local sugar beet farmers and grant farmworkers the right to contract directly with local growers. >

Aftermath
Japanese and Mexican laborers, formerly pitted against each other, had unified to achieve their labor goals. The success that the JMLA achieved showed the effectiveness of a multi-racial labor front and showed that class and Asian and Mexican shared oppression could be the unifier in labor organizing.

<The racial dimensions of the JMLA victory against the WACC brought several issues to the attention of the mainstream American labor movement which traditionally refused to integrate minorities and agricultural workers into unions. While certain socialist groups and local factions of organized labor supported the JMLA and therefore the organization of Japanese and Mexican laborers as well as farmworkers, the majority of AFL affiliates and leadership did not support the JMLA. This position was mostly based in anti-Asian attitudes and the traditional exclusion of farm laborers from AFL activities. >



Feedback from Instructor
These look like useful additions. However, I'd like to see more contributions, either to this article or another. What are you thinking of doing next? Saguaro23 (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)