User:Owais Al Qarni/10

Encyclopaedia Iranica
DEOBAND,country town northeast of Delhi in what is now the Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh, India, where an influential Dār al-ʿolūm was founded by a group of religious scholars in 1867 as an expression of a major religious reform movement partly inspired by British educational models. The goal was to train a class of religious scholars dedicated to a version of Islam stripped of many customary practices deemed deviant. The curriculum was based on the dars-e neẓāmī developed at the Farangī Maḥāll in Lucknow in the 18th century, though with less emphasis on “rational” studies in favor of a thorough grounding in the Koran and Hadith. Although the Deobandis were originally apolitical, by the 1920s many of them supported the Indian nationalist movement and later opposed the creation of Pakistan.

As part of a 19th-century trend away from Persian in favor of modern vernaculars, Urdu, with its heavy admixture of Persian vocabulary and forms, was the language of instruction. In this respect the Deoband school led in establishing Urdu as the language of Indian Muslims. Many Arabic and Persian religious texts were translated into Urdu. Nevertheless, as Sufis, many of the teacherscontinued to cherish the great tradition of Persian mystical poetry. For example, Moḥammad Yaʿqūb Nanawtawī, the first principal (sadr modarres; 1867-88) and a revered spiritual guide (mūršīd), was said to recite Rūmī’s maṯnawīs silently, lest the whole forest burn from his passion (Metcalf, 1982, p. 166).

Encyclopédie de l’Islam
dans le district de Sahāranpur de l’État d’Uttar Prades̲h̲, est une ville très ancienne, mais les débuts de son histoire se perdent dans le mythe et la fable. Dans l’un des nombreux bois qui entourent presque entièrement le site de la ville, se trouve un ancien temple de Devi. C’est pourquoi on a supposé que son nom est une corruption de Devi-ban «forêt de la déesse». La référence la plus ancienne que l’on en possède se trouve dans l’Âʾīn-i Akbarī où Abū l-Faḍl parle d’un fort construit «en briques cuites à Deoband». On trouve toutefois à Deoband des monuments plus anciens. Le Čattâ masd̲j̲id est condidéré comme l’un des plus anciens monuments de Deoband et remonte au début de la période pathāne. Selon la tradition, le S̲h̲ayk̲h̲ ʿAlāʾ al-dīn, connu sous le nom de S̲h̲āh-i Ḏj̲angal Bās̲h̲, qui y est enterré, était un élève d’Ibn al-Ḏj̲awzī et un disciple du s̲h̲ayk̲h̲ S̲h̲ihāb al-dīn Suhrawardī. On voit encore à Deoband des mosquées et d’autres édifices construits sous les règnes de Sikandar Lōdi (894-923/1489-1517), Akbar (963-1014/1556-1605) et Awrangzīb (10681118/1658-1707).

De nos jours, Deoband est renommée pour son foyer de science religieuse musulmane, le Dār al-ʿulūm, fondé par Ḥād̲j̲d̲j̲ī Muḥammad ʿĀbid Ḥusayn avec l’appui de trois éminents savants du Département de l’éducation, et placé sous le patronage de Mawīawī Muḥammad Ḳāsim, en 1282/1865. Durant les dernières 90 années, cette institution s’est acquis une réputation inégalée parmi les institutions reliieuses musulmanes. Elle allie les caractères de trois différents types d’établissements religieux existant au XIXe siècle à Dihlī, Lucknow et Ḵh̲ayrābād. A Dihlī, on insistait sur l’enseignement du tafsīr et du ḥadīth; à Lucknow, on s’adonnait au fiḳh, tandis que Ḵh̲ayrābād se spécialisait dans le ʿilm al-kalām et la philosophie. Deoband fait la synthèse de ces trois expériences, mais elle insiste surtout sur les traditions établies par S̲h̲āh Walī Allāh et son école de muḥaddit̲h̲īn de Dihlī. Elle attire des étudiants de nombreuses régions du monde musulman. On a prévu des logements ¶ pour près de 1500 étudiants. Les bâtiments du Dār al-ʿulūm comprennent une mosquée, une bibliothèque, et un certain nombre de salles de conférence pour le ḥadīt̲h̲, le tafsīr, le fiḳh, etc. Sa bibliothèque, bien qu’elle ne possède pas de catalogue, est l’une des plus riches de l’Inde en manuscrits. Elle contient 67 000 ouvrages, imprimés et manuscrits, en arabe, persan et urdu. L’enseignement est de type traditionnel, et on cherche plus à former une personnalité religieuse qu’à fournir des connaissances répondant aux besoins de l’époque moderne. L’institution a donc surtout produit des chefs religieux, bien qu’on ne puisse ignorer la contribution qu’elle a apportée dans le domaine politique. Beaucoup de ceux qui étaient en relation avec elle se sont placés à l’avant-garde de la lutte pour l’indépendance nationale. Les principaux fonctionnaires du Dār al-ʿulūm sont: le sarparast (directeur), le muhtamim (secrétaire), le ṣadr mudarris (principal) et le muftī. Ces postes ont été tenus par d’éminents personnages, tels Mawlānā Ras̲h̲īd Aḥmad Gangūhī, M. Muḥammad Yaʿḳub, M. As̲h̲raf ʿAlī, S̲h̲ayk̲h̲ al-Hind Maḥmūd Ḥasan, M. Anwar S̲h̲āh Kas̲h̲mīrī et Sayyid Ḥusayn Aḥmad Madanī. Le secrétaire actuel, M. Muḥammad Ṭayyib, est un petit-fils du fondateur de l’institution. La Ḏj̲āmiʿatʿulamāʾ-i Hind, organisme très influent des ʿulamāʾ de l’Inde, reçoit presque toute son impulsion idéologique du Dār al-ʿulūm.

Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān
The name given to Muslim scholars (ʿulamāʾ) associated with the Indo-Pakistani reformist movement centered in the religious school (dār al-ʿulūm) of Deoband, a country town some ninety miles northeast of Delhi. Founded in 1867, the school was a pioneering effort to transmit the religious sciences by organizing staff and instruction on the model of British colonial schools (see traditional disciplines of qurʾānic ¶ study ). The goal of the school was to preserve the teachings of the faith (q.v.) in a period of non-Muslim rule and considerable social change by holding Muslims to a standard of correct individual practice. Central to that goal was the creation of a class of formally trained and popularly supported religious scholars (ʿulamā, see scholar ) who served as imams (see imām ), guardians and trustees of mosques (see mosque ) and tombs, preachers, muftis, spiritual guides, writers and publishers of religious works. The school's curriculum has included study of the art of reciting the Qurʾān (tajwīd, qirāʾāt, see recitation of the qurʾān ), of translation (tarjama, see translation of the qurʾān ) and of qurʾānic commentary (tafsīr and uṣūl-i tafsīr such as Jalālayn; Shāh Walī Allāh, al-Fawz al-kabīr; al-Bayḍāwī, Anwār; and Ibn Kathīr, Tafsīr; see exegesis of the qurʾān: classical and medieval ). At its first centenary in 1967, Deoband counted almost 10,000 graduates including several hundred from foreign countries. Hundreds of Deobandi schools, moreover, have been founded across the Indian sub-continent.

The early Deobandis were associated with a shift in emphasis from the rational sciences (al-ʿulūm al-ʿaqliyya) to the revealed or traditional sciences (al-ʿulūm al-naqliyya) of Qurʾān and, above all, ḥadīth. In this they followed their forebear, Shāh Walī Allāh Dihlavī (1702-63) whose qurʾānic commentary stressing the clear meaning of the Qurʾān was highly influential and whose translation of the Qurʾān into Persian stimulated further translations into Urdu, among them two produced by his sons. They have also been firmly committed to the Ḥanafī legal tradition (see law and the qurʾān ). The Deobandis were among those ʿulamāʾ who took advantage of the newly available lithographic presses to disseminate sacred texts and vernacular ¶ materials widely. The scholar and revered spiritual guide, Mawlānā Ashraf ʿAlī Thānavī (1864-1943), one of the most influential Deobandis of this century, is an important example of the school's qurʾānic scholars. He was an accomplished reciter (qāriʾ) of the Qurʾān, enjoyed the prestige of those who knew the holy text by heart(ḥāfiẓ), was esteemed for his natural voice in recitation and authored many works on tajwīd. He translated the Qurʾān into excellent and accurate Urdu and prepared a twelve-volume commentary, Tafsīr bayān al-Qurʾān, with citations from ḥadīth to elucidate matters of law and Ṣūfism (see ṣūfism and the qurʾān ).

Deobandi devotion to the Qurʾān was not merely scholarly. When Rashīd Aḥmad Gangōhī (1829-1905), for example, read the Qurʾān alone at night, his biographer wrote, he would be overcome with joy or shake in terror as he read of God's mercy (q.v.) or his wrath (see anger ). The Deobandis also used sections of the Qurʾān for ʿamaliyyāt, i.e. prescriptions of certain prayers and readings intended to secure particular concrete goals. Indeed another of Ashraf ʿAlī Thānavī's books was the Aʿmāl-i qurʾānī, intended to save common people from undertaking illegitimate works (aʿmāl).

The central school, as well as Deobandi schools throughout the sub-continent, continue to teach many students. The apolitical strand within the school's teaching has taken shape for many in the widespread, now trans-national, pietist movement known since the 1920s as Tablīghī Jamāʿat; the movement has particularly cherished the popular writings of Mawlānā Muḥammad Zakariyyā Kandhalavī (1897-1982), among them the Faḍāʾil-i Qurʾān (1930) and its discussion of forty ḥadīth.

Deobandīs in Africa
The South Asian diaspora includes Deobandīs who have settled in Africa. The name of the movement derives from that of the Indian city of Deoband, northeast of Delhi, where, in the mid-nineteenth century, a reformist madrasa, Dār al-ʿUlūm, was founded by prominent Sunnī scholars in reaction to British colonialism in India, which they considered a threat to Islam. Deobandism today is an orthodox Sunnī tradition (maslak) with a transnational presence.

South Asian merchants and professionals of Gujarati Indian ancestry are the major adherents of Deobandism in Africa, but immigrants from other regions of India and a tiny number of African Muslims are also advocates of Deobandism.The most visible Deobandī community in Africa is among South Africa’s approximately one million Muslims. Although the Barelwīs—a movement that arose in late-nineteenth-century in Bareilly, east of Delhi, under the leadership of Mawlānā Aḥmad Riḍā Khān Barelwī (d. 1921), emphasising the love of God for the Prophet as well as the intercession of the Prophet and the saints with God for the forgiveness of their followers’ sins at all times—rivals of the Deobandīs, are also present in South Africa and other regions, the Deoband school remains predominant among orthodox Muslim groups. Deobandīs have many clerical (ʿulamāʾ) institutions in several provinces of South Africa and in other southern African states. They lead mosques, offer religious advice, and promote their brand of Islam via newspapers, radio, religious publications, and a vibrant Internet presence. The principal Deobandī organisations are the national body called Jamiatul Ulama of South Africa and its provincial councils of theologians in the provinces of Gauteng, Kwazulu-Natal, and the Western Cape.

Madrasas, Islamic seminaries for advanced learning resembling those in South Asia, also flourish under Deobandī tutelage in several southern African countries. In various parts of South Africa alone there are at least a dozen Deobandī-affiliated madrasas where students are trained to become jurist-theologians (ʿulamāʾ). Deoband-aligned madrasas for males and strictly segregated ones for females also exist in countries such as Zambia, Malawi, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Mozambique, and Uganda, where small to medium-sized madrasas provide religious training to young adults and to students from neighbouring countries. Madrasas are often the initiative of a single person, a scholar or pious figure linked to the ʿulamāʾ community or from an existing madrasa network in South Africa, the United Kingdom, India, or Pakistan. Most madrasas are supported by local donors who are committed to advancing and promoting the teachings of the Deobandī school.

The most effective recruitment for the Deobandī school takes place through the Tablīghī Jamāʿat, which was founded by Mawlānā Muḥammad Ilyās (d. 1944) in India in the 1920’s and now has a vast global presence. The basic principles of the Tablīghī Jamāʿat are the invitation (daʿwa) to the practice of Islam (an individual responsibility of all Muslims) by self-financing itinerant groups, the mingling of social classes within these groups, the deepening of the faith of those who are already Muslims, and the promotion of Muslim unity (Gaborieau). Persons affiliated with the pious Tablīghī Jamāʿat invariably gravitate towards the Deobandī fold. The Tablīghī Jamāʿat gives Deobandī networks an unmistakable transnational character, even though there is no formal affiliation between the two; they do, however, share a common religious worldview and genealogy. North African Tablīghī Jamāʿat activists often link up with their sub-Saharan counterparts through their spiritual and religious revival activities. While the Deobandīs are less visible in central Africa, the presence of the Tablīghī Jamāʿat in West Africa and North Africa is often a harbinger of a more enduring Deobandī presence.

Most Deobandīs follow the Ḥanafī legal rite, but some Deobandī madrasas in Africa accommodate the teaching of Shāfiʿī and Mālikī law in order to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse Deobandī student body. African Deobandī practice shows signs of acclimating to its environment and seems to nurture greater diversity in the once exclusively Ḥanafī-centred Deobandī school.

Long-established Deobandī communities in Africa also make their presence felt in public life. In order to lead a sharīʿa-compliant social life, some Deobandīs take the initiative to promote an orthodox faith-based life. Procuring ritually-slaughtered meat, dhabīḥa (prescribed method of ritual slaughter), and food production that conform to sharīʿa prescriptions are priorities. Private Islamic secular schools are another feature of public life in which Deobandīs are increasingly engaged.

Encyclopédie de l’Islam: As̲h̲raf ʿAlī
b. ʿAbd al-Ḥaḳḳ al-Fārūḳī, naquit à T’hāna Bhawan (district de Muzaffarnagar, Inde) le 12 rabīʿ I 1280/27 août 1863, et mourut le 6 rad̲j̲ab 1362/9 juillet 1943. Il fit ses études dans sa ville natale et à Deoband [q.v.]; quittant Deoband en 1301/1883-4, il débuta comme professeur à Cawnpore. La même année, il effectua le pèlerinage à la Mekke, où il rencontra Ḥād̲j̲d̲j̲ī Imdād Allah al-Hindī al-Muhād̲j̲ir al-Makkī avec qui il était déjà en correspondance. Il renouvela sa bayʿa, déjà faite in absentia, et devint officiellement son disciple. En 1307/1889-90, il repartit pour la Mekke, et y resta pendant quelques mois avec Imdād Allah. Il quitta Cawnpore en 1315/1897-8 et se fixa à T’hāna Bhawan pour le reste de ses jours.

Savant éminent, théologien et ṣūfī, il mena une vie très active, enseignant, prêchant, écrivant, faisant des conférences et effectuant à l’occasion des voyages. Écrivain politique, ses ouvrages dépassent le nombre d’un millier. La plupart sont relatifs au tafsīr, au ḥadit̲h̲, à la logique, au kalām, aux ʿaḳāʾid et au taṣawwuf. Il écrivit son premier ouvrage, un mat̲h̲nawī persan intitulé Zīr o-Bani, alors qu’il était encore étudiant; son dernier est al-Bawādir al-Nawādir, publié en 1365/1945-6, qui est une sélection de ses innombrables écrits. Ses plus célèbres ouvrages sont: 1) Bayān al-Ḳurʾān, commentaire du Kurʾān, en 12 vol., en urdu, achevé en deux ans et demi et publié d’abord à Delhi en -334/-9-6-7. Une édition revisée et élargie a été publiée à T’hāna Bhawan, en 1353/1934-5 et à Delhi en 1349. Depuis lors, plusieurs éditions ont paru; 2) Bihis̲h̲tī Zēwar, en 10 vol. également en urdu, compendium d’enseignements islamiques, destiné aux femmes. Le nème vol., Bis̲h̲tī Gawhar, pour les hommes, a été ajouté beaucoup plus tard. Il a été fréquemment imprimé dans l’Inde et au Pakistan et est encore très demandé. Une collection de ses fatāwā en 8 vol., compilée après sa mort, est en cours de publication.

Encyclopaedia of Islam: Madanī, Ḥusayn Aḥmad
Mawlānā Sayyid Ḥusayn Aḥmad Madanī (1879–1957) was the foremost madrasa-based Islamic scholar to participate actively in the Indian nationalist movement and oppose, on both pragmatic and Islamic grounds, the creation of the separate state of Pakistan. Madanī attended the Dār al-ʿUlūm at Deoband, a major centre for reformist Ḥanafī scholarship, where he studied with Mawlānā Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan (d. 1920) and became a disciple in taṣawwuf (Ṣūfism) of Mawlānā Rashīd Aḥmad Gangohī (d. 1905). In 1892, his pious father resigned as a government schoolteacher and moved the family to Medina, where Madanī soon established himself as a teacher in the Deobandī specialty of ḥadīth. In 1915, he welcomed Mawlānā Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan when he came to the Hijaz in the hope of securing Ottoman support for an anti-colonial assault on British India from the Afghan frontier. This plot, known as the “Silk Letter Conspiracy” was uncovered when the Punjab Criminal Investigation Department discovered letters written on silk being smuggled to Mawlānā Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan in the Hijaz. The diverse leadership of the plotters, based in Kabul, hoped to capitalise on the Ottoman-German alliance against Britain in World War I to secure military support against British rule in India. Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan and Ḥusayn Aḥmad were both interned as prisoners of war in a camp on the island of Malta, where they interacted with Young Ottoman army officers and other international figures. There, Madanī honed his own nationalism and his antipathy to what he saw as self-interested European machinations in both India and the Middle East.

In 1919, in response to plans to dismember the Ottoman Empire and extend European protectorates over much of its former area, Indian ʿulamāʾ and Western-educated professionals organised a Khilafat Conference to defend the interests of the sultan as khalīfa, whose betrayal was considered an act of British perfidy. Also in 1919, the Jamīʿat al-ʿUlamāʾ-i Hind (JUH) was formed to serve simultaneously Muslim interests and the non-violent nationalism of the Indian National Congress (INC) under the leadership of Mohandas K. Gandhi (d. 1948), who also embraced the defence of the caliphate. Leaders of the INC and the JUH were present in 1920 to welcome the return from Malta of Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan and Madanī, who plunged into the rising nationalist movement. Following Maḥmūd al-Ḥasan’s death in November 1920, Madanī succeeded him and served as president of the JUH for much of the remainder of his life. In 1921, because of his calls for non-cooperation, Madanī was charged with conspiracy and sentenced to two years’ hard labour, the first of what would be prison terms in each of the three decades preceding Independence. During those decades he also taught at and, from 1927, served as principal of, the Dār al-ʿUlūm, and toured to encourage Muslims to make Islamic and personal improvements.

Madanī dismissed the Islamic separatism of two major and very different figures, the Islamist Abū l-Aʿlā Mawdūdī (d. 1977) and the poet/philosopher Muḥammad Iqbāl (d. 1938). Mawdūdī’s vision of socio-political life ordered by Islamic principles, Madanī argued, was completely inappropriate for India, given the dispersal of Muslims and their sectarian range: any attempt to legislate Islamic behaviour would lead to totalitarianism rather than the persuasion appropriate to a modern state. He likewise judged as impractical and untrue to Prophetic example Muḥammad Iqbāl’s idealistic and romantic call for regions of Muslim autonomy as the basis for Islamic socio-political life. Madanī, in contrast, embraced the modern, territorial nation-state with its citizens united by shared land and history. Its model, he maintained, was the Covenant of Medina (622 C.E.), when Muslims and non-Muslims shared a common polity, united against all enemies, even other Muslims. To abandon India, moreover, was to abandon the possibility of continued peaceful conversion. Madanī’s most famous defence of united India, Muttaḥida qawmiyyāt awr Islām (“Composite nationalism and Islam,” 1938), was written in debate with Iqbāl. He also wrote two works during the war years, thanks in part to the leisure of imprisonment—Hamārā Hindūstān awr us ke faḍāʾil (“Our India and its glories,” 1941), which celebrated a mythic and Islamic attachment to the motherland, and Naqsh-i ḥayāt (“Traces of a life,” 1953), an autobiography and history that culminated in a detailed and factual account of the political and economic abuses of colonialism and Muslims’ exemplary role in defying it.

Mass political mobilisation had intensified in the wake of the devolution of increased power to the provinces in the India Councils Act of 1935. The Muslim League (ML), fuelled by fear of Hindu domination, subsequently made great popular gains and, in the Lahore Declaration of 1940, declared autonomous and sovereign “independent states” its goal. Much of the leadership spoke generally of governing principles of equality and democracy, but others espoused various visions of a utopian Islamic state. A breakaway faction of ʿulamāʾ formed the Jamīʿat al-ʿUlamāʾ-i Islām (JUI), amongst them Mawlānā Shabbīr Aḥmad ʿUthmanī (d. 1949) and Muftī Muḥammad Shafīʿ (d. 1976), the Deoband madrasa’s muftī, in support of the Pakistan movement. ʿUthmanī, as head of the JUI, imagined an ideal society guided by the Covenant of Medina, as he understood it, in which Muslims dominated the dhimmī populations (non-Muslims living under the protection of the Muslim state in which they live) and the successors of the Prophet, whom he took to be the scholarly leadership, ruled.

Madanī unleashed a flood of pamphlets in 1945 and 1946 in an attempt to challenge ML and JUI claims. In 1945, the JUH convened multiple anti-Pakistan groups (amongst them occupational groups such as the Bihārī weavers, from the province/state of Bihar) and regional Muslim parties (from the Frontier, Punjab, and Bengal) as well as the All India Muslim Majlis and the Independent Party to form the Muslim Parliamentary Board, with Madanī as chair. They contested the election of 1945–6 but to no avail. Madanī, as representative of the board, along with other nationalist Muslims, participated in the failed “Cabinet Mission” deliberations of April 1946, questioning elections that had been based on a narrow franchise and that trafficked in religious fear. Chastened by the interwar creation of European protectorates, moreover, he feared great-power interventions in two weaker countries rather than one unified state.

Madanī stood for a more socially just society once an independent country curtailed the exploitation of the British and their privileged collaborators. He also, like Gandhi, envisioned a communitarian organisation of society, with the ʿulamāʾ as guides to the personal and ritual lives of Muslims. Such aspects of the JUH vision were very much products of their time, but the fundamental stance of its members was, as Peter Hardy has argued, of potentially greater relevance. They justified equal citizenship with non-Muslims from within the Islamic tradition, and they confirmed, against all talk of an Islamic state, the treatment of sharīʿa as an internal moral imperative. This was a lasting legacy for India and the wider Muslim community.

Encyclopédie de l’Islam: (Ḥād̲j̲d̲j̲ī) Imdād Allāh
al-Muhād̲j̲ir al-Hindī al-Makkī b. Muḥammad Amīn al-Fārūḳī, né à Nānawta (district de Sahārānpūr, Inde) en 1231/ 1815, directeur spirituel et précepteur de plusieurs importantes personnalités religieuses de l’Inde (notamment Muḥammad Ḳāsim al-Nānawtawi, fondateur du Dār al-ʿulūm de Deōband [q.v.], Ras̲h̲īd Aḥmad al-Anṣārī de Gańgōh (m. 1323/1905), muḥaddit̲h̲, faḳīh, théologien et savant en renom de son temps, et As̲h̲raf ʿAlī Thānawī [q.v.]).

Ḥāfiẓ du Ḳurʾān, il était assez instruit en persan, en grammaire arabe et en jurisprudence, mais il ne fut jamais considéré comme un ʿālim dans son sens traditionnel. Il passa sa jeunesse à acquérir une bonne connaissance du taṣawwuf et s’établit bientôt comme s̲h̲ayk̲h̲ dans une mosquée de sa ville natale, Thāna Bhawan (à une trentaine de km. au Nordouest de Muẓaffarnagar), qui devait, par la suite, prendre le nom de Ḵh̲ānḳāh-i Imdādiyya, siège de sa silsila. La ville fut incendiée en manière de représailles à la suite de l’insurrection de 1857, puis reconstruite; elle vit naître des personnalités telles qu’As̲h̲raf ʿAlī Thānawī, dont l’un des disciples fut Sulaymān Nadwī, le célèbre biographe du Prophète en ourdou.

Imdād Allāh accomplit son premier pèlerinage à La Mekke en 1261/1845, ce qui lui valut le titre honorifique de «Ḥād̲j̲d̲j̲ī». Durant la révolte de 1274/1857, Imdād Allāh et ses collègues proclamèrent le d̲j̲ihād contre les Britanniques à la suite de l’exécution d’un certain ʿAbd al-Raḥīm, personnalité de Thāna Bhawan, accusé d’intelligence avec les rebelles. Après avoir établi un gouvernement paral-lèle dans la ville, ils attaquèrent S̲h̲āmlī, petit bourg des environs, mais furent battus par les Britanniques. Imdād Allāh réussit à s’enfuir, mais les autres chefs du groupe rebelle furent arrêtés et traités avec quelques ménagements. Craignant d’être arrêté, Ḥād̲j̲d̲j̲ī réussit à quitter le pays incognito et à atteindre La Mekke (1276/1860), où il s’établit à demeure (muhād̲j̲ir). Nouveau venu et vu d’un assez mauvais œil par la population, il connut au début des jours difficiles à cause de sa pauvreté. A côté d’autres activités, il fit des cours sur le Mat̲h̲nawī de Rūmī dans le Ḥaram S̲h̲arīf. Son renom de Ṣūfī se répandit peu à peu et il commença à attirer un grand nombre de partisans. Des Indiens, pour la plupart des savants de Deōband, traversèrent les mers pour obtenir sa bayʿa; As̲h̲rāf ʿAlī Thānawī était du nombre. A La Mekke, il se maria trois fois à un âge assez avancé, mais aucune de ses femmes ne lui donna d’enfant.

Imdād Allāh est l’auteur des ouvrages suivants: Ḍiyāʾ al-ḳulūb (en persan; éd. Delhi 1877) écrit en 1282/1865, sur les ad̲h̲kār et les as̲h̲g̲h̲āl (formules et pratiques) de l’ordre des Čis̲h̲tiyya [q.v.]; G̲h̲id̲h̲ā -yī rūḥ (en ourdou) contenant d’étranges contes et paraboles en vers pour mettre en garde contre les séductions de Satan; Ḏj̲ihād-i akbar, long poème en ourdou composé en 1268/1852 sur les vertus et mérites du ḳitāl, en fait traduction d’un traité anonyme en persan, ce qui montre que même avant l’insurrection de 1857, il avait réfléchi au d̲j̲ihād et avait été ainsi conduit à sa malheureuse aventure de S̲h̲āmlī; Tuḥfat al-ʿus̲h̲s̲h̲āḳ, également mat̲h̲nawī en ourdou composé en 1281/1864, sur la gnose et la connaissance de Dieu et sur al-ḥaḳīḳa wa-l-mad̲j̲āz; Dardnāma-i g̲h̲amnāk, petite complainte d’un amoureux délaissé en forme de petit poème en ourdou; Irs̲h̲ād-i miirs̲h̲id, poème en ourdou composé en 1293/1876 sur ses expériences spirituelles et ésotériques et contenant aussi des exhortations morales et des ¶ apophtegmes; Waḥdat al-wud̲j̲ūd, en persan, bref traité composé en 1299/1882 sur la doctrine de l’Unité de l’Être proposée par Ibn ʿArabī; Fayṣala-i haft masʾala, traité sur sept sujets discutés de son temps, tels que le samāʿ, la visite des tombes, la célébration de l’anniversaire de la mort d’un saint, etc.; cet écrit provoqua une scission parmi ses adeptes; Gulzār-i maʿrifat, recueil de ses vers en persan et en ourdou sur des sujets spirituels et mystiques; une Ḥās̲h̲iya en persan sur le Mat̲h̲nawī (éd. Cawnpore 1314-21/1896-1903) en partie publiée après sa mort; Maktūbāt-i Imdādiyya (éd. As̲h̲raf ʿAlī Thānawī, Lahore 1966), recueil de 50 de ses lettres écrites en ourdou de La Mekke au cours des dernières années de sa vie (la dernière est datée de 1317/ 1899); Marḳūmāt-i Imdādiyya, 61 lettres en persan publiées en appendice à Imdād al-mus̲h̲tāḳ (éd. As̲h̲raf ʿAlī Thānawī, Lucknow 1915); Kulliyyāt-i Imdādiyya, recueil de ses compositions poétiques publié à plusieurs reprises en Inde et au Pakistan (éd. Cawnpore 1315/1898, S̲h̲āhkōf, dist. S̲h̲eik̲h̲ūpūra. s.d.). La plupart de ses écrits sont en vers, mais il n’eut jamais la prétention d’être un grand poète. Tous les ouvrages d’Imdād ont été publiés plusieurs fois en Inde et au Pakistan, sauf la Ḥās̲h̲iya sur le Mat̲h̲nawī.

Largement considéré comme un grand maître spirituel, il mourut en 1317/1899 à La Mekke, après avoir atteint l’âge respectable de 84 ans, et fut enterré au Maʿlâ, le cimetière historique où reposent la première épouse du Prophète, Ḵh̲adīd̲j̲a, et son oncle Abū Ṭālib.

Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE: Ashraf ʿAlī Thānavī
Ashraf ʿAlī Thānavī (1863–1943) was a major Ṣūfī and religious scholar of twentieth-century South Asia.

1. Life Thānavī was born on 5 Rabīʿ II 1280/19 September 1863, in Thāna Bhavan (Thāna Bhavan), a small town in the United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh), in northern India. He received his advanced education at the Dār al-ʿUlūm of Deoband, a madrasa founded in 1867, with which thousands of other “Deobandī” madrasas throughout South Asia and beyond have come to share their doctrinal orientation. Thānavī graduated from the Dār al-ʿUlūm in 1883 and spent much of the next fourteen years teaching at the Jāmiʿ al-ʿUlūm madrasa in Kānpūr. In 1897 he left that madrasa to take up residence in Thāna Bhavan. Ḥājjī Imdād Allāh (d. 1899), a noted Chishtī Ṣūfī master, occupied a Ṣūfī lodge (khānaqāh) in Thāna Bhavan, before emigrating to Mecca in the aftermath of the Mutiny of 1857. Thānavī was initiated into the Ṣūfī path by Imdād Allāh, first in 1882, through correspondence with him, and then, in person, two years later, on the occasion of Thānavī’s first pilgrimage to Mecca. After leaving Kānpūr, he came to assume Imdād Allāh’s mantle at the Ṣūfī lodge in Thāna Bhavan, the Khānaqāh-i Imdādiyya.

Over the next forty-six years, a large and varied stream of writings poured forth from the khānaqāh. Several works were devoted to remedying what Thānavī, like other Deobandīs, saw as the infiltration of wayward beliefs and practices into Muslim religious life. The Deobandīs believed that a self-conscious adherence to the teachings of the Qurʾān and the ḥadīth, as refracted through the norms of the Ḥanafī school of law, and a sense of individual moral responsibility were among the best means not only of salvation but also of preserving an Islamic identity in the adverse political conditions of British colonial rule. For those who had the inclination towards and ability for advanced religious learning, the Deobandīs established numerous madrasas, as did many of their doctrinal rivals in India. With the dexterous use of the opportunities newly available through the technology of print, they also made sustained efforts to inculcate in ordinary Muslim men and women textually-anchored Islamic ethical and legal norms. None did so more extensively or more effectively than Thānavī. His Bihishtī zevar (“Heavenly ornaments”), in Urdū, intended specifically to reform the beliefs and practices of Muslim women, is a classic in this genre and remains an influential work.

Thānavī wrote numerous fatwās, an Urdū translation of and commentary on the Qurʾān, some theological works addressing primarily those educated in modern, Westernised institutions, and diverse works on Ṣūfī themes. Not for the first time in the history of Ṣūfism, especially in South Asia, Thānavī’s own Ṣūfī discourses (malfūẓāt) were systematically committed to writing and later published, usually after they had been reviewed and approved by Thānavī himself. The most complete collection of these malfūẓāt is al-Ifāḍāt al-yawmiyya min al-ifādāt al-qawmiyya (“Daily elaborations for the people’s benefit”). Thānavī also kept up an extensive correspondence with those seeking guidance from him in matters of Ṣūfī doctrine and practice. Selections from this correspondence made their way into several works, notably his Tarbiyat al-sālik (“Training the wayfarer”), in which various aspects of the experiences of those taking the Ṣūfī path are analysed in detail.

Much of the output of the khānaqāh came from Thānavī’s disciples living at the Ṣūfī lodge and, in some instances, teaching at the adjacent madrasa, the Imdād al-ʿUlūm; some of the most prolific of the Deobandī ʿulamāʾ of the twentieth century were his disciples. In several cases, their writings were commissioned or otherwise overseen by Thānavī. This was the case, for instance, with Ẓafar Aḥmad ʿUthmānī’s (d. 1974) ḥadīth commentary, Iʿlāʾ al-sunan (“Exalting the [Prophet’s] normative teachings,” 21 vols., Karachi 1414–5/1994–5, ed. Ḥāzim al-Qāḍī, Beirut 1997), which seeks to demonstrate the concordance between ḥadīth reports and the norms of the Ḥanafī school. Early in his career, Thānavī had also embarked on an ambitious commentary on the Mathnavī of Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī (d. 672/1273). Two of his disciples, Shabbīr ʿAlī and Ḥabīb Aḥmad Kayrānavī, later completed this work, the Kilīd-i mathnavī (“The key to the mathnavī”) which took the form of their writing down and elaborating upon Thānavī’s regular discourses on this work. Towards the end of his life, Thānavī also commissioned an exegetical work devoted specifically to elucidating the legal content of the Qurʾān. This commentary, the Aḥkām al-Qurʾān (“The legal rulings of the Qurʾān”) (5 vols., Karachi 1987), was completed by three of his disciples, including Muḥammad Shafīʿ (d. 1976), the leading muftī (jurisconsult) at the Dār al-ʿUlūm of Deoband before the partition of the Indian subcontinent. Thānavī died in Thāna Bhavan, on 16 Rajab 1362/19 July 1943.

2. Thānavī’s thought Thānavī’s most important juridical work is al-Ḥīla al-nājiza lil-ḥalīlat al-ʿājiza (“The consummate stratagem for the powerless wife”), first published in 1933. In this work, produced in collaboration with several leading Deobandī ʿulamāʾ, Thānavī addresses problems created by the absence of sharīʿa judges (qāḍīs) in colonial India. Ḥanafī law limits strictly a woman’s ability to end her marriage and, in any case, requires a Muslim judge to rule in favour of any such dissolution initiated by the wife. There were, however, no qāḍīs in much of British India, and this had caused many women severe hardship. In several cases, these women had apostasised as a way of ending undesirable marriages, for traditional Ḥanafī law stipulated that an apostate from Islam was no longer deemed married to her Muslim spouse. The Ḥīla al-nājiza was an effort to redress some of the problems facing Muslim women. It contributed substantially to the enactment of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 and has remained influential in subsequent discussions of the laws of Muslim personal status in postcolonial India.

In his Ṣūfī writings, Thānavī’s overarching concern was to demonstrate the concord between Ṣūfī doctrine and practice on the one hand and the juridical norms of the sharīʿa on the other. In this respect, he is part of a larger Deobandī trend—indeed, its most influential exponent. Ṣūfī piety was, to him, a matter of discipline and practice, not “mere” mystical experience. The significance of this view lay,among other things, in its fostering a sense of individual moral agency: anyone with the necessary determination, not just the chosen few, could progress along the Ṣūfī path. It also represented a way of challenging the claims of rival Ṣūfīs in colonial India who not infrequently combined spiritual authority with economic and political power. Thānavī held that a “true” master (shaykh or pīr) was one who guided his disciples in their ethical formation and did so explicitly within the framework of authoritative sharīʿa norms, not one who sought to impress his followers with claims to esoteric knowledge and miracle-working or who derived his authority merely from his guardianship of revered Ṣūfī shrines.

Thānavī lived through a time of major changes in Indian politics—from the consolidation of colonial rule in the late nineteenth century, to movements of mass mobilisation in the early twentieth century, to demands for a separate homeland for the Muslims of South Asia. He died several years before the establishment of Pakistan in 1947 and never quite overcame his misgivings about a Muslim political leadership educated in modern Western (or Westernised) institutions and having few scruples—as he saw it—about subordinating Islamic norms to political expediency. Yet, he had even greater misgivings about the prospects of Muslims living in a predominantly Hindu India, and he was bitterly opposed not just to the Indian National Congress and one of its best-known leaders, Mohandas K. Gāndhī (d. 1948), but also to those ʿulamāʾ, led by his fellow Deobandī Ḥusayn Aḥmad Madanī (d. 1957), who argued that Muslims ought to struggle jointly with the Hindus to secure a united, independent India. Thānavī never became directly involved in Indian politics, although he did lend his support guardedly to the All India Muslim League, which claimed to be the representative political organisation of the Muslims of India and which eventually led the movement for the establishment of Pakistan. In the years following his death, some of his closest associates, notably Ẓafar Aḥmad ʿUthmānī and Muḥammad Shafīʿ, played important roles in mobilising Muslim support in favour of the demand for Pakistan.

Encyclopaedia of Islam: S̲h̲iblī Nuʿmānī
Urdū writer and historian, was born during the Indian Mutiny of 1857, in a village, 8 miles away from Aʿẓamgaṛh, U. P., in which his ancestors had been living as zamīndār’s for about 300 years. His father, S̲h̲aik̲h̲ Ḥabībullāh, was a wakīl at Aʿẓamgaṛh with a good legal practice. S̲h̲iblī, after having been educated in Islāmic sciences at home, under the famous scholar Muḥammad Fārūḳ of Čiraiiyākōt, made a further study of fiḳh under Mawlawī Irs̲h̲ād Ḥusain at Rāmpūr; in 1289 (1872) he went to Lāhōr, where he specialized in Arabic literature under the eminent Arabist, Professor Faiḍ al-Ḥasan. After his return from Lāhōr, he specialized in ḥadīt̲h̲ under Mawlawī Aḥmad ʿAlī of Sahāranpūr, and then went to Dēoband, where he learnt Farāʾiḍ in about 6 weeks.

In 1880 he passed the wakīl’s examination, practised law at Aʿẓamgaṛh and Bastī but for a few months, acted as copyist and amīn in the Aʿẓamgaṛh district for a short time, and took to indigo trade; but nothing suited him. While staying with his younger brother who was being educated at ʿAlīgaṛh, S̲h̲iblī was introduced to Sir Saiyid Aḥmad who made him a teacher in the Collegiate School and soon after appointed him as one of the professors of Arabic and Persian (February 1, 1882). His coming in contact with Sir Saiyid had a very healthy influence on the young man’s literary activities, and he very soon learnt to utilize the store of knowledge he had gathered ¶ during the past years of his life. In 1892 he undertook a journey to the Near East to get acquainted with the literary and educational conditions there, and visited Constantinople, Beirut, Jerusalem, Cairo and other places. He was given a literary pension by the Niẓām of Ḥaidarābād in 1314 (1896) and resigned his Professorship in 1898; was Director of the Department of ʿUlūm-u Funūn, Ḥaidarābād (April 1901—January 1905), Hony. Secretary of the Dār al-ʿUlūm of the Nadwat al-ūlamāʾ, Lakhnaʾū (1905—1913); was also, for sometime, Hony. Secretary of the And̲j̲uman-i Taraḳḳi-i Urdū. He died in 1914, and, just after, his pupils established, in his memory, the Dār al-Muṣannifīn at Aʿẓamgaṛh, with a library and a publishing house, and with the monthly journal “Maʿārif” as its organ. S̲h̲iblī’s works are: Urdu: Musalmānōñ kī guzas̲h̲ta Taʿlīm, Āgra 1887; al-Maʾmūn, a biography of the Ḵh̲alīfa, Āgra 1887: Sīrat al-Nuʿmān, a biography of Abū Ḥanīfa, Āgra 1891; al-Ḏj̲izya, on the origin of the word, Āgra 1891 (Engl. translation, ʿAlīgarh); Kutubk̲h̲āna-i Iskandarīya, Āgra 1891 (Engl, translation, Ḥaidarābād); Safarnāma, Āgra 1893; al-Fārūḳ, ʿUmar’s biography, Kānpūr 1899; al-G̲h̲azālī, the Imām’s biography, Kānpūr 1903; ʿIlm al-Kalām, ʿAlīgaṛh 1903; al-Kalām, Kānpūr 1903; Sawāniḥ-i Mawlāna Rūm, Lakhmaʾū 1902; Muwūzana-i Anīs-u Dabīr, a criticism of two Urdu poets, Āgra 1906; S̲h̲iʿr al-ʿAd̲j̲am i.-iv., ʿAlīgaṛh 1909-1912, v. (unfinished), Aʿẓamgaṛh 1919; Sīrat al-Nabī, i.—ii., Kānpūr 1919—1920, iii. (unfinished), Aʿẓamgaṛh; Kullīyāt-i Urdū (Poems); Rasāʾil-i S̲h̲iblī; Maḳālat-i S̲h̲iblī; Makātīb-i S̲h̲iblī, 2 vols, (all published lately, Aʿẓamgaṛh). Persian: Kullīyāt (Poems), Aʿẓamgaṛh. Arabic: al-Ḏj̲izya, ʿAlīgaṛh; al-Intiḳād ʿala ’l-Tamaddun al-Islāmī li Ḏj̲urd̲j̲ī Zaidān, Lakhnaʾū.