User:Owais Khursheed/sandbox

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the central figure of Ahmadiya community. Ahmadiya community believe that he is Messaih, Mahdi and deputy prophet of God after Muhammad as he claimed the same during his lifetime. Due to the nature of his claims and teachings, he has been criticized throughout his life and ever since his death by many noted individuals and scholars. His critics have existed in 19th, 20th and 21st century. The initial criticism came from Molana Sanaullah Amritsari while he (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) was alive. They held many debates among themselves during their life time.

Adulaziz bin Abdullah bin Baz
The Quran and Sunnah confirms that Muhammad is the last prophet of Islam. Ibn Baz criticizes him for his claiming of prophethood and says that his claims are false and against the sources of Islam ie; Quran and Sunnah.

Fatwa committee KSA
We examined the religious concepts of Qadyani group which was founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani who claimed prophethood and being Messaih. Mirza claimed that prophethood never ended on Islamic prophet Muhammad but it continued till date, and he his himself is a prophet and has received more than 10 thousand verses from revelations. All these things are mentioned in his book "Baraheen Ahmadiya" and his booklet "At-Tableeq".

The council also examined sayings of his successor Mirza Bashir ud din Qadyani. We found in his book "Ayinanay Sadaqat" that the Muslim who does not believe in Messaih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) whether he knows about him or not, he is a kaffir and out of the fold of Islam.

The Fiqah council announces to all Muslims, Muslim governments, Scholars, Authors that this group and his leader are out of the fold of Islam because of their religious concepts which mainly include finality of Prophethood.

Government of Pakistan
State Assemblies of Pakistan in 1974 consider him as Non-Muslim and his followers as Non-Muslim minority in Pakistan.

Muhammad Al-Munajjid
Al Munajjid also criticizes him on his claims like finality of Prophethood and that Jesus didn't die on cross and traveled to Srinagar that the Mirza had beliefs quite dissimilar to the beliefs of common Muslims.

Muslim World League
The Muslim World League in April 1974 issued the Fatwa considering him and his followers out of the fold of Islam.

Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani
Islamic prophet Muhammad said: Țhere will be many imposters after me, In Silsilatul Ahadith as Sahiha, the Narration is "Every one will claim to be a prophet, whereas I am the seal of the prophets, threre are no prophets after me". In some other narrations he said: If there would have been prophet after me, it would have been Umar.

Ehsan Elahi Zaheer
Ehsan Elahi Zaheer criticised Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani for claiming of prophethood, the theory that Jesus survived crucifixion and lived a normal life in Srinagar and his views about Jihad.

Muhammad ibn al Uthaymeen
In the light of Quran and Sunnah, the Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani and his followers are out of the pale of Islam because of their religious concepts which are dissimilar to that of common muslims.

Sanaullah Amritsari
The Ahl-e-Hadith scholar criticized Mirza due to claim of prophethood, messaihship and theory that Jesus mentioned him the prophet after him in 61th chapter of Quran.

Finality of Prophethood
Mirza Ghulam is criticised for his teachings that go against Islamic sources. Consider the following sources:

http://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/chenani-nashri-tunnel-patnitop-tunnel/

Albani
http://www.excellup.com/classeight/matheight/linearexfour1.aspx Imaam Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee Al-‘Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah – Sharh wa Ta’leeq (pg. 39-40) Al-Ibaanah.com The Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) informed his ummah in many ahaadeeth, advising and cautioning them, that there would be many imposters (Dajjaaleen) after him. In some narrations, he (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Everyone will claim to be a prophet, whereas I am the seal of the prophets – there being no prophet after me.” [Reported by Muslim and others; See al-Ahaadeeth as-Saheehah: no. 1683]

Amongst these imposters was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Al-Qadiyani who claimed prophethood for himself. He has followers spread throughout India, Germany, England and America. And they have masaajid which they use to misguide the Muslims. There were some individuals amongst them in Syria as well, but Allaah uprooted them and eradicated them. http://www.answering-islam.org/Gilchrist/Vol1/9c.html http://www.holesinholy.com/ghulamahmadis.html The Acquifer properties of the acquifer essentially depend upon the composition of the acquifer. The most important properties of the acquifer are porosity and specific yield which in turn give its capacity to release the water in the pores and its ability to transmit the flow with ease. Sadura railway station rl 1633.275 mhttp://www.grotal.com/Srinagar-Kashmir/Nischal-Jewellers-C130/

salih uthaymeen
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

It is not part of the Sunnah to let the hair grow long, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) let his hair grow because the people of that time used to do that. Hence when he saw a boy who had shaved part of his head he said: “Shave all of it or leave all of it.” If it was the case that the hair should be left to grow long, he would have told the boy to leave it (and not shave any part of it).

Based on that, we say: Letting the hair grow long is not part of the Sunnah, but if people customarily do that, then do it, otherwise do what the people customarily do, because something may be Sunnah in a specific sense or it may Sunnah in a general sense. For example, if there is nothing to render a garment or a “look” haraam, then in this case the Sunnah is to follow what the people customarily do, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did it because he was following the custom of the people. So now we say: The custom of people nowadays is not to let the hair grow long. Hence our senior scholars, the first of whom we will mention among the senior scholars is our Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn as-Sa‘di, and our Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, and other shaykhs such as Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem and his brothers, and other senior scholars, do not let the hair grow long. That is because they do not think that this is Sunnah, and we know that if they thought that this was Sunnah, they would have been the most eager of people to follow the Sunnah. So the correct view is that this matter is to be based on what people usually do. So if you are in a place where people usually let their hair grow long, then do it, otherwise do not do it. End quote.

Liqaa’aat al-Baab al-Maftoohah, no. 126, question no. 16

Based on that, reference should be made to what is customary among the people with regard letting the hair grow long. In societies where the men do not let their hair grow long, one should not let it grow long, and tying it at the back of the head is even more reprehensible, because it is an imitation of women and immoral people.

And Allah knows best.