User:Owen Kennedy/Scottish fiddling/DeadlineBreaking Peer Review

General info
Owen Kennedy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Scottish fiddling
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Scottish fiddling

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The comment fits in well with the rest of the article and matches together seamlessly. The edit adds in information that isn't already present in the article and is pretty concise and right to the point.

Content:

The content is relevant to the topic and still remains up-to-date with today's knowledge.

Tone and Balance:

The content is neutral in tone. It doesn't try to sway anyone to a certain cause (which I mean, it's only a sentence, so it's pretty hard to do a lot of opinion swaying).

Sources and References:

The source that was cited is very relevant to the edit and is a good, scholarly choice. It's a reliable source of information.

Organization:

The content is currently very well-written, but the only grammatical changes I would add would be to add a comma and possibly a colon.

"While the Cape Breton style has differed over time from the Scottish style, it has kept some of the same stylistic points: one of which is the accentuated up-driven bow."

Images and Media:

For your current edit I don't think it needs any images and media, though if you plan to expand the edit more, maybe an audio file would add some flair. But so far it doesn't really need it.