User:Owenpendley/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Graphic novel


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The information in the article is very relevant, especially considering that the term "Graphic novel" is not used as widely today as it once was. I was not distracted by anything in the article.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * None of the information in the article is out of date because of the lengthy history of the term "Graphic novel". However, the article seems to lack information regarding recent graphic novels and cultural implications in the past decade or so.
 * What else could be improved?
 * Looking at the talk section, I realize that Wikipedia rates this article as a level 5-vital article, meaning that it has been rated as Top-Importance on the Importance Scale. Upon further reading I have found that other editors have found possible historical errors, broken links, and non-free citations.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is very neutral and does not appear biased toward any particular position on graphic novels.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are very few, if any, viewpoints on the history of graphic novels, none of which are overrepresented or underrepresented in this article.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I checked 5 articles. Three of them worked perfectly and supported claims in the article, one did not lead to any substantial information, and one was linked to a copy a book on Google Books, however, you cannot access the book.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Each fact is referenced to a reference at the bottom of the article. Most of these sources and links work, are neutral, and come from trusted sources such as the encyclopedia or trusted journals. However, a few links are broken or do not contain the information that a reader would expect to see.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Most of the conversation is about fixing broken and unreliable links.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is rated C-Class on the quality scale and is in the WikiComics Project.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The article discusses the history of graphic novels whereas in class we mostly discussed the content and history behind specific novels.

Potential Women

 * Bessie Tucker (Mathematician)
 * Gabriella Del Grosso (Italian Mathematician)
 * Marie-Charlotte de Romilley de La Chesnelaye (French Mathematician)
 * Angela Vadnal (Slovene Agronomist)
 * Eunice Gray Smith (Mathematician) **

Eunice Gray Smith
Eunice Gray Smith is credited by NASA as being one of the human computers as the NASA Langley facility from 1935-1960.

Article:

= Eunice Gray Smith = From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Eunice Gray Smith (born December 31, 1928 ) is an African-American mathematician whose work helped