User:Owenwilborn/Artificial transcription factor/Emribo3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Owenwilborn


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Artificial transcription factor


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Artificial transcription factor

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Relatively - oldest is from 2002 but I am confident that the information from these sources is still relevant.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * All content fits well. It might be nice to look into the history of ATFs and include it at the beginning. (Addressed)
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes - I checked the 3rd source and the information seems to align.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * I did a brief search and it seems like the sources used cover the topic well. However, some sections (ie TALEs) are a little brief and it could be useful to expand, either by including more information from the original source used or find new ones. (Addressed)
 * Are the sources current?
 * Relatively - see above
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * N/A
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Seems like almost all of the sources are review articles - nice!
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * No

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No image added but I noticed an image in the sandbox that might be added?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content is well written, concise, and easy to follow. The organization made it easy to follow and think that it was great that information earlier in the article is referred to later on (ie in the applications), giving it a great flow.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Additionally information on ATF history and expansion on shorter sections would make the article more complete. Are there more applications or types of ATFs? If so, it might be cool to include some of these. (Addressed)