User:PGupta0604/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cambridge University Library

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
We've talked a lot about libraries in our class, and I thought it would be interesting to look at a library outside of the United States.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is concise while providing an overview of what is included in the article.

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The content is up to date, including information from 2022. The only section that could be brought into question is the Digitization Project. There is no citation, and the information seems to be from 2010.

The tone seems to be pretty neutral.

There are some paragraphs that don't have citations following them, making me wonder where they got that information from. There are also a couple links citied that don't work anymore.

Everything is well-organized and easy to read, and there seems to be no spelling or grammatical errors.

All of the images have good captions and are spaced out throughout the page. They all adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

The topics in the talk page are Collections at the UL, Matching Buildings?, Clean up "fun" section?, Classification scheme, Librarians, Peter Fox, Cambridge Digital Library, and Mistake in Article. It's rated C-class and is part of the following WikiProjects: University of Cambridge, East Anglia, Libraries, and Higher education. I guess that in terms of libraries, one topic that the editors are interested in is how the students interact with the building itself beyond academics such as graffiti and such.

I would say that while the article is already off to a good start, there seems to be a lot more information that could be added, since this is a pretty significant university library.