User:PHYS 563 Student (KT)/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Solar neutrino


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is my number 1 choice because it is not only very relevant to the course, but the article could use a lot of work. The foundation of it is solid. There is no bias, and there are some good sources and pictures, but the article could use a lot more information.


 * Sources
 * Publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269398006571?casa_token=C8rP3bfc-egAAAAA:6EtjZ2cuAuz7fP4JEKxddR1tJ3aKieO4GG3I8EXOZFb6cz6vLfK3bp4hTYHOoyqVVjT8xIg3Ng
 * Publication: https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.052010

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Weak interaction


 * Article Evaluation
 * This is a very good article, that does not have much more to add to it. It has a full review of the topic from the history and background for someone who is not super familiar with Weak Interactions all the way to specific formulas for someone that is much more versed in the field. The information is organized and presented well with many sources that are cited correctly.


 * Sources
 * Publication: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1998/cs/a827057z/unauth#!divAbstract

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Dark matter


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has a lot of information, however it is not given a GA or FA rating by Wikipedia. The article is given a B, meaning it is moderately developed. I do not think there is much more to add in terms of information to this article as there is already a lot, but the article could use some cleaning up by removing some concepts that are repeated multiple times in the article.


 * Sources
 * Publication: https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014
 * Publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037015739090081C?casa_token=AFdzs2bMp0UAAAAA:dY326eKD-LQrYHm49FOb4GT4GLUPKdD9OBQ61x6t4Q3wQdTqRfVlms451T__1sdVUZ5mrDAE_w

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Cosmic ray


 * Article Evaluation
 * Similar to the Dark Matter article, this article is given a a B rating by Wikipedia, meaning it is moderately developed. Again, there is a lot of information provided in the article but it can be further developed. All the necessary sections are covered but each some section is kept short when they can be further detailed. For example there is a lot about the history, which is important, but then background information is lacking.


 * Sources
 * Publication: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984acr..book.....B/abstract
 * Research (pdf): file:///C:/Users/kun42/Downloads/Glnzburg1958_Article_OnTheOriginOfCosmicRays.pdf

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Gamma ray


 * Article Evaluation
 * Wikipedia says this article is moderately developed but reading through it in terms of content the information is very concise yet detailed. There is a lot of topics the article visits but gamma ray is a very broad subject matter. One way the article can be developed is expanding on the background information.


 * Sources
 * publication: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/69/8/R01/meta