User:Pacman118/Reverse Krebs cycle/JonnyBoy6989 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BFonzy56, Jackanaegle, Austinbridges12345, Pacman118


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Reverse Krebs cycle


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
One of the things that I really liked about the page is that lots of the words were highlighted in blue to where if I wasn't sure what it meant, I could hover the cursor over to see the definition. One thing that I would like to see is citations for those, because from what I saw, there were none. I liked what I read so far, and obviously the paper isn't near close to being published, but it is missing a conclusion. There were some very informative images that helped me understand what was being written which is a great addition. There are only 5 citations at the bottom of the page so I'm not sure if there were supposed to be more. Other than that the sentence structure looks great and provides a very neutral point of view.