User:Page Up/Opinion

After all this time editing and observing Wikipedia, I must say that this free online encyclopaedia project is flawed due to the large number of unpunished vandals and unchecked POV pushers (including some administrators - yeah, they are people like the others) who are continuously trying to disrupt the contributions of good faith mindful editors and killing Wikipedia’s reliability, neutrality and accuracy. Because of these facts, one can find here both a large number of exceptionally trustworthy and comprehensive articles with great quality, but also a colossal amount of absolute nonsense and aberrant misinformation. An outstanding article could be ruined in a matter of seconds when left unsupervised, and unfortunately, we can't have a guardian for every single article.

Some thoughts for a better Wikipedia:
 * Cancel the anonymous editing policy
 * Block pathologic vandal clowns for not less than two years
 * Create a rigid registration process with scrolling lists from where the user must pick a number of options and provide a valid email for registration (i.e.: decade of birth, country, native language, gender, etc.)
 * The creation of new articles can’t be done by new users with a few edits
 * Set policies to encourage and enforce the obligation of using trusted sources and good references in the articles

And finally the most difficult...


 * Create a large group of administrators to take action as source/reference checkers and updaters
 * Demote administrators who have committed wrongdoing. One would say that administrators need practice, I would say that cretinism and ignorance don't mix well with administratorship.