User:Pagelliad/Pinakion/Iphigenia in Tauris Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pagelliad


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pagelliad/Pinakion?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pinakion

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The article itself is just a stub, the student has done well in adding information regarding the topic into a lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, definitely. Describes the purpose of a Pinakion in greater detai

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

I think that the information added to the article describes democracy but does not have any content that is not neutral. It is a great explanation on the use and importance of the pinakion.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the sources used look very academic and profesional
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * This is a very specific item to be researching, and I do think that it looks like the information presented is well-informed.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links do not work yet, and they are for books/articles, it looks like they are still working on formatting their article at this time.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, I think the information added is great.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, it looks good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, perhaps some subsections could be added, but it is a small article, so there is not much space to do that!

Images and Media

 * It sounds like you are working on getting an image or two for the page, that would be great! Looks like the article has one already, but more examples maybe of different styles would be awesome.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Absolutely!! It was just a stub before and now there is so much more context and information in the article its awesome!
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * There are definitions for the greek words that are not obvious, and the information leads to a greater understanding of the ancient item.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * A little more formatting/organizing, which seems to be what you are working on right now. Other than that, looks great!