User:Pago240/Gap analysis (conservation)/Sweendog8 Peer Review

General info
Pago240/Gap analysis (conservation)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Pago240/Gap analysis (conservation)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Gap analysis (conservation)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content uploaded is relevant, provides sources and provides a clear and concise breakdown of studies mentioned. Adds good examples of how citizen science impacted a lack of knowledge on those particular species.

Maybe break to a new paragraph when starting the conversation about the first example article. If you needed more, expand on the implications of gaps in habitat range and what that may mean for a species.