User:Paigeberzinski/Glass frog/Nolss011 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Paigeberzinski


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Paigeberzinski/Glass frog


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Glass frog

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The inclusion of the Camouflage section was a good decision. It adds to the depth of the article. Although it is early, plan to find a bit more sources in order to expand on some other sections. The article itself is more developed, so getting more information is critical in contributing more. There's a lot of potential in this article.

No changes made to the lead. It is pretty well developed, so only touch it if you decide to include a new section into the article.

This article is well developed, finding new content may be a bit challenging. However, this should not stop you from finding areas to improve upon or expand in the article itslef.

Overall, there is an unbiased tone that remains constant with the work present.

No images or graphics were added, might want to look to include something along those lines later.

The article is organized well into distinct sections that contribute well to the overall article.

Again, look for some more sources or find ways to expand upon outdated sources, but overall, a very well developed article with lots of potential.