User:Paigebodnar/Folk taxonomy/Catiamehring Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Paigebodnar


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Folk taxonomy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that the way you have worded every section of the article exceeds expectations in the best way possible. Every sentence is precise, neutral/unbiased, and clear. I also like how many links are included to other Wikipedia articles, and how you included a "see also" section of the article. In the lead, I would maybe suggest defining terms such as "form taxa" in the sentence. I understand that it links to another article that defines it, however I found myself having to look at the definitions of a couple terms throughout the lead.

I like the chart that you added at the bottom, it makes it clear where folk taxonomy fits in in the grand scheme of evolutionary psychology. I also like the image and the caption, it definitely makes the article more visually engaging and pleasing. One suggestion that I have is maybe include one or two more references, and expand on the subject using those references in the lead section. I think that there must be other available sources that can really expand on the subject and validate your article more.