User:PalmyranRealness/Homeric Shield (Dura Europos)/Gfs634 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) PalmyranRealness


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Homeric shield from Dura-Europos
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Homeric shield from Dura-Europos (already published)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead is really great, contains a brief summarization of the context of Dura-Europos, followed by concise description of the object and its provenance. Also provides short summary of the object's history of damage, citation needed on that bit of info. First body of content section describes the object's archaeological discovery, with thorough citations backing up all of the text. Next body of content describes its design, and the next the making and function of the object - this is an elegant bit of article organization from PalmyranRealness; structure makes the article straightforward and readily legible by the reader. Overall tone is neutral and descriptive; no extraneous user editorial content is added. Images are well laided out and labeled, and references and citations are exhaustive and extremeley detailed. Good amount of hyperlinks in the article, but I think there could be more. Overall impression is of a well layed-out, well written, clear and neutral article that is readily accessible to a layman reader with no prior Dura-Europos knowledge.