User:Pancakes2022/Lumbar vertebrae/Citmoreno9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Pancakes2022)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lumbar vertebrae


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lumbar vertebrae

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead introduces the topic of the article. In the lead it is brief but straight to the point of what is the topic that will be talked about. The lead is concise and not too open to over explanation. The added content is relevant to the topic, although different body parts were brought up they all conclude to the main idea of the article. The way the article is organized is all clear, there are different sections which makes it easier to read and analyze the article. With this topic there is no biased so the entire article is neutral on the topic. The images are first off, visually pleasing and correlate to the topic of the article. The images do have a caption that explains the image itself. The images are specific to what is being explained in detail. I would recommend to erase some since there are many images representing the same thing. The article is supported by reliable sources and they are credited as well. The content adds to the article as it explains human evolution and it also brings in other animals in order to compare the lumbar vertebrae. The article is strong within itself and the added commentary just gives it more strength and reliability.