User:Panchovillastan/Navy Petty-Officers School/Ridley0526 Peer Review

The Lead is good an focuses on the right topics.

The content is good and focuses on a important section of the population.

The content is mostly balanced and representative of the overall point of view. Its not really easy to stay neutral or not take sides with this kind of issue so it might be something to look at. The sources all worked and were relevant to the topic. Some were in Spanish which may pose a barrier but I speak enough to understand they were still helpful.

The content added was mostly good there were a few grammatically issue that you might want to deal with to improve the edits. I would suggest reading i through once or twice out loud to make sure you catch everything.

The content has been helpful and added to the overall article it was very specific and might be a part of another article as well>

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)