User:Panda1600/Rural health/Laguan0206 Peer Review

General info
Panda1600
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Rural Health
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rural health:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Citations were used correctly and the material was well-researched. I believe under "community engagement" that text is being presented less an neutral, and I think it is coming off across as bias. I think including places/ programs that have implemented these suggested and including their outcomes can be a lot stronger with your writing. Your edits were also very detailed and relevant to the exisiting information, for example the impact of solar energy.

Overall, the writing was very concise and easy to read, and you included credible citations, so good job!